|
PROFESSOR SMITH: If they would follow your suggestions they would soon have another Garden of Eden.
THE PRESIDENT: Professor Smith has reminded us that the crops in the Garden of Eden were purely tree crops, and they grew without effort. But after the fall Adam and Eve had to go out and cultivate the soil and raise corn. Probably in that garden they had pecans and walnuts. I believe that is his theory and it may be good.
PROFESSOR SMITH: O, beg your pardon, that is in the book of Genesis. The text describes nothing whatever except trees, and then Adam fell and had to dig in the ground and make his bread by the sweat of his face.
MR. POTTER: Is the tree of knowledge the pecan tree?
THE PRESIDENT: I don't know. Can any one else say?
PROFESSOR SMITH: My remarks on the Garden of Eden were brought out by what our President said, but I have published others that are not very lengthy and you can buy them.
THE PRESIDENT: Let's hear from Mr. Lockwood.
MR. LOCKWOOD: Dr. Knapp wants me to expose my ignorance and tell you the crimes I committed and intended to commit. It was about three years ago that we purchased a little over a thousand acres in Gibson County, near Grayville, and about three hundred and fifty acres of it were in timber. We decided to clear up as rapidly as possible all the forest land and cultivate it in corn. Now comes the crime which Dr. Knapp wants me to expose and I am going to confess it. We deadened probably a hundred of as fine pecan trees as you ever saw, from six to eighteen inches in diameter, and Dr. Knapp heard about it and visited our farm, and it was on his account principally that we quit cutting the pecan trees. Now if anybody else cuts them we have them arrested. We have the second best orchard in Gibson County. I have joined the association and came here to get a line on you and I have got a good many good things by coming. I would like to have you visit our farms. We have some very fine trees to see and I will also give you something to eat, because I am the chief cook. I want to emphasize the remark one member made that it is a great work these men are doing. You get that impression when you come to the meeting, and it shows great sacrifice and love for their fellow men.
THE PRESIDENT: That is very good, Mr. Lockwood. Now Dr. Knapp will tell us what he thinks.
DR. KNAPP: I know very little about pecans but I was interested in Mr. Lockwood's trees because he had a magnificent pecan orchard, possibly five hundred trees, and they were contemplating having the trees cut down because they thought they were in the way of the cultivation of the land for corn. This is not the case because the pecan tree goes away down deep for water and is not like the surface root trees. I have seen large wheat fields in the same location with large pecan trees in them, and men have told me that they produce just as much per acre on the land where the pecan trees are as where there are no pecan trees. I went to see Mr. Lockwood and took him what little literature I had on the pecan industry and promised to send him some more, and insisted that he read it before he destroyed his trees. He kept his promise and I am glad to see that he has taken an interest in the pecan industry.
THE CHAIRMAN: You are a real benefactor, Dr. Knapp, and entitled to great praise.
PROFESSOR SMITH: While we are distributing things gratis I want to make a little statement in the same vein as a previous speaker. He points out the work that a few enthusiasts are doing. Most of the things worth while are done by the people who never get any credit in a financial way. You will find the things that count are started and done by that live force of men that work for the fun of working with no promise of reward. Why should Mr. McCoy or Mr. Reed come down here and tell us how to bud trees, and what varieties to use? It is plainly a labor of enthusiasm and love. I want to express my particular appreciation of the work done by Mr. Thomas P. Littlepage. We hear from Indiana through Mr. Littlepage. On every occasion when we get in trouble and want bud wood, along he comes and helps us out. He seems to have all kinds of equipment for keeping it or he can always go to a pecan tree and get it. We never hear of the trouble or expense. He spends money as if he had a barrel of it. He has spent lots of money trying to get the people to know there was an Indiana pecan. We also know that Mr. McCoy and Mr. Wilkinson and others too numerous to mention have lost thousands of dollars and have worked long and hard to get this industry started. The industry needs enthusiasm and no end of work. It means work to get out and hunt trees and bud wood and these men are entitled to lots of credit for their efforts.
THE PRESIDENT: The chair appreciates that compliment but he is hardly entitled to so much praise. However, all the efforts we have made to create interest in the pecan have been well spent. We have had lots of trouble in getting bud wood and if it had not been for Ford Wilkinson we never would have gotten anywhere. He is the best climber in the country. He has gone at all times and under all conditions and has done more real hard work than all the rest of us put together. He always climbs the trees. The Major tree is about fifty feet to the first limb. We couldn't have gotten along without him. And Mr. McCoy is entitled to great credit. The first time I ever saw the Posey nut Mr. McCoy brought some to my home in Boonville. That was a number of years ago. He first stimulated Mr. Brown to put the Warrick pecan on exhibition. As I grew up I knew where these pecan trees were and who kept a dog and what time he got up and there were not many pecan trees then I would not attempt to climb, but I wasn't as large as I am now. Of late years Mr. Wilkinson has done more than I have along that line.
MR WILKINSON: I appreciate what you say of me but it takes all kinds of people to make a world and to grow pecan trees. I have tried to do my part but without the others I couldn't have done anything. We expect to continue at the work as long as there is any success in sight at all and hope soon that some of the hard part will be over.
THE PRESIDENT: Before we leave that subject I want to say that a few years ago some of us who had begun to think we knew something about the pecan and were quite sure of our ground, induced Mr. C. A. Reed of the Department of Agriculture to come down here and make some trips through these woods and tell us what he knew, or what he thought of these pecans. We gave him all the facts we could, and the suggestions he made started us on the right track as to the varieties to propagate.
THE PRESIDENT: The boat is ready, but before we go I want the report on nominations. I want the officers elected in Enterprise.
DR. DEMING: I would like to say this before we proceed to the election of officers. There has been some talk among us that it would stimulate interest in our work and meetings, and would enable us to confer honors on more people, and more members who deserve such honors, if the term of the presidency were limited to one year. There has been no rule about it but our first two presidents have each held office two years. They have been re-elected to office as a matter of courtesy and appreciation of their efforts. If from now on we limit the term of the presidency to one year I think it would be better. We think it would be desirable to make the rule that the President shall not be eligible for immediate re-election, that is, he shall not follow himself. I mention it so that if this rule is adopted in the revision of our constitution and by-laws the person who is about to be elected President, and the members of the association, will understand that there will be nothing personal about such action.
THE PRESIDENT: In connection with that I should like to say that the present President has at different times heard suggestions of that kind made, and I am glad you mentioned it. I wasn't fortunate enough last year to be at the meeting, as I had to be in St. Louis to help try a case before the interstate commerce commission, or I should have brought that up then.
Dr. Morris is absent and Professor Close is the next on the committee on nominations. Professor Close, will you report?
PROFESSOR CLOSE: I did not know I was the next member and Dr. Morris did not leave any data with me. However we discussed it and decided to recommend the election of J. Russell Smith for President, Mr. W. C. Reed for Vice-President and Dr. Deming for Secretary and Treasurer.
THE PRESIDENT: Any remarks on the report of the nominating committee? If not, those in favor of adopting the report, thereby declaring the officers named elected, make it known by rising. (Vote taken.) Contrary by the same sign. Your officers for the next year will be Dr. J. Russell Smith, President, W. C. Reed, Vice-President, and Dr. W. C. Deming, Secretary and Treasurer. I congratulate the association.
Meeting adjourned.
* * * * *
Meeting called to order at 8:30 p. m., at Evansville, Indiana.
PROFESSOR SMITH: The members of this association have always got to be on the lookout for good parent trees of any and all varieties of nuts. I think, however, there is a shortage of information in the matter of walnuts. I have talked to a number of persons and it is the general opinion that we want to know, and know quickly, more about parent trees of the Persian walnut. I therefore move that the chair appoint a committee to give this matter particular attention during the next twelve months and report at the next annual meeting.
(Seconded and carried)
THE PRESIDENT: The chair appoints the incoming President, C. P. Close and C. A. Reed.
The next is the question about the place of the next meeting. It occurs to the chair that it might be desirable to leave that to the executive committee. But that is a matter for the association to decide and the chair will entertain motions or suggestions.
MR. C. A. REED: I was going to move that it be left to the committee. I know from past experiences that is the best course to pursue.
(Seconded and carried.)
COLONEL VAN DUZEE: I would like very much to extend a cordial invitation to the members of this association to meet with the National Association at Thomasville, Georgia, in October. We have a program full of merit. Our meeting will be held in the heart of the nut planting area where all the pecan planting has been done in the last few years. We have several fine orchards in the immediate vicinity and matters of general interest will be discussed. We would be glad to have anybody that can meet with us, and if you have friends interested in nut culture we will be glad to have them.
THE PRESIDENT: It is unnecessary to say that the South has forged ahead of us in pecan culture, and she not only has great pecan orchards but she has great men who have done this work and they will be at the meeting of the National Nut Growers. I have had the pleasure of attending some of these meetings and I can say to the members here it will be well worth their while to go down there.
Is there any further business? If not we will have Colonel Sober's paper, after which the pictures will follow.
PROFESSOR SMITH: I am sure after hearing Colonel Sober's lecture, and seeing his pictures, we will want to ask him some questions. I know that Colonel Sober has worked out an unique method in the root system, and I wish he would tell us about it.
COLONEL SOBER: The slides I have will show that.
THE PRESIDENT: Is there anything else?
MR. DOAN: How does Colonel Sober take care of the blight?
COLONEL SOBER: In answer to that I will say that in 1909 I discovered the blight on some trees, just a speck, and I took my knife and cut it off. That is my best method and then you are sure of it.
THE PRESIDENT: Are there any further questions?
MR. DOAN: Are all his trees Paragon?
THE PRESIDENT: I think they are. The Secretary will read Colonel Sober's paper.
* * * * *
The Secretary here read extracts from the preface and introduction to Fuller's book on nut culture, prepared by Col. C. K. Sober, with personal interpellations, as follows:
* * * * *
I believe that the moment is opportune for advocating an effort to cultivate all kinds of edible and otherwise useful nut-bearing trees and shrubs adapted to the soil and climate of the United States, thereby inaugurating a great, permanent and far-reaching industry. We are spending millions for imported articles of everyday use which might easily and with large profit be produced at home, and in many instances the most humiliating part of the transaction is that we send our money to people who do not purchase any of our productions and almost ignore us in commercial matters. I am not referring to products ill-adapted to our climate, nor to those which, owing to scarcity and high price of labor, we are unable to produce profitably, but to such nuts as the walnut, hickory, butternut, pecan and chestnut which we can raise as readily as peaches, apples and pears. There certainly can be no excuse for the neglect of such nut trees on the score of cost of labor in propagation and planting, because our streets and highways are lined and shaded with equally expensive kinds, although they are absolutely worthless for any other purpose than shade or shelter, yielding nothing in the way of food for either man or beast. Can any one invent a reasonable excuse for planting miles and miles of roadside trees of such kinds as elm, maple, ash, willow, cottonwood and many other similar kinds, where shellbark hickory, walnut, butternut, pecan and chestnut would thrive just as well, cost no more, and yet yield bushels of delicious and highly prized nuts, and this annually or in alternate years, continuing, and increasing in productiveness for one, two or more centuries. The nut trees which grow to a large size are just as well adapted for planting along roadsides, in the open country, as other kinds that yield nothing in the way of food for either man or beast. They are also fully as beautiful in form and foliage, and in many instances far superior to the kinds often selected for such purposes.
The only objection I have heard of as being urged against planting fruit and nut trees along the highway is that they tempt boys and girls as well as persons of larger growth to become trespassers. I find this only applies to where there is such a scarcity that the quantity taken perceptibly lessens the total crop. But where there is an abundance either the temptation to trespass disappears or I fail to recognize the loss. As we cannot very well dispense with the small boy and his sister I am in favor of providing them bountifully with all the good things that climate and circumstance will afford.
On my farms in Irish Valley, Northumberland County, Pa., I have planted a Paragon chestnut tree every forty feet along the public highways and driveways making a total of 769 trees. These trees range in age from four to ten years old.
A mile in this country is 5,280 feet, and if chestnut trees are set forty feet apart, which is allowing sufficient room for them to grow during an ordinary lifetime, we get 133 trees per mile in a single row. Two rows may be planted, where the roads are wide enough, one on each side, and then we get 266 trees per mile. I can estimate the crop when the chestnut trees are twenty years old at two bushels per tree, or 532 bushels for a double row per mile. At the moderate price of $4 per bushel, we would realize $2,128 for the crop on a double row, with a fair assurance that the yield would increase steadily for the next hundred years or more, while the cost of gathering and marketing the nuts is no greater, and in many instances much less, than that of the ordinary grain crops. At the expiration of the first half century one half of the trees may be removed, if they begin to crowd, and the timber used for whatever purpose it may best be adapted. The remaining trees would probably improve, on account of having more room for development.
The chestnut thrives best in light, well drained soil, and those containing a large proportion of sand or decomposed quartz, slate and gravel; but it is rarely found, nor does it thrive very well, in heavy clays or limestone soil where the limestone rock comes near the surface. It is true that chestnut groves, and sometimes extensive forests, are found on hills and ridges overlying limestone, but a careful examination of the soil among the trees will show that it is a drift deposit containing little or no lime. I find in Pennsylvania the chestnut tree grows from the banks of the Susquehanna River to the tops of the mountains.
In planting the chestnut tree it should never be planted any deeper than it was in the nursery rows. If planted any deeper it is certain death to the tree, as I find that the earth placed around the trees above where it was in the nursery rows scalds and destroys the tree. Here is where the great mistake is made in planting out the chestnut tree, and this I have found out by practical experience. It is far better to plant it one inch less than it was in the nursery than to plant it an inch deeper.
There has been a steady increase in the demand for, and a corresponding advance in the price of all kinds of edible nuts during the past three or four decades, and this is likely to continue for many years to come, because consumers are increasing far more rapidly than producers. Besides, the forests, which have long been the only source of supply of the native kinds, are rapidly disappearing, while there has not been, as yet, any special effort to make good the loss by replanting or otherwise. The dealers in such articles in our larger cities assure me that the demand for our best kinds of edible nuts is far in excess of the supply, and yet not one housewife or cook in a thousand in this country has ever attempted to use nuts of any kind in the preparation of meats and other dishes for the table, as is so generally practiced in European and Oriental countries.
The question may be asked if the demand is sufficient to warrant the planting of the hardy nut trees extensively along our highways or elsewhere. In answer to such a question it may be said that we not only consume all of the edible nuts raised in this country, but import millions of pounds annually of the very kinds which thrive here as well as in any other part of the world.
Where farmers want a row of trees along the roadside, to be utilized for line fence posts, they cannot possibly find any kinds better adapted for this purpose than chestnut, walnut, hickory and pecan. In a few years they may yield enough to pay the taxes on the entire farm, the crop increasing in amount and value not only during the lifetime of the planter, but that of many generations of his descendants.
This appeal to the good sense of our rural population is made in all sincerity and with the hope that it will be heeded by every man who has a spark of patriotism in his soul, and who dares show it in his labors by setting up a few milestones in the form of nut-bearing trees along the roadsides—if for no other purpose than the present pleasure of anticipating the gratification such monuments will afford the many who are certain to pass along these highways years hence.
It is surely not good policy to enrich other nations at the expense of our own people, as we are now doing in sending millions of dollars annually to foreign countries in payment for such luxuries as edible nuts that could be readily and profitably produced at home. There need be no fear of an overproduction of such things, no matter how many may engage in their cultivation.[A]
[Footnote A: Note by the secretary: At the time when Fuller wrote his excellent book, the chestnut blight, as at present known, had not been observed, although he makes an interesting reference to some disease of the chestnut, of unknown nature, at one time destructive to the trees in the Piedmont region. The Northern Nut Growers Association does not recommend the planting of the chestnut in any region where the chestnut blight, Endothia parasitica, is prevalent. With this exception the association is heartily in sympathy with the sentiments expressed by the writer.]
* * * * *
COLONEL VAN DUZEE: I have no questions to ask, but as I am going to be obliged to leave the session before the close of the lecture, I should like to express my appreciation of the paper which has been read and make a remark or two. I am so heartily in sympathy, in this commercial age, with some of the thoughts expressed there, that it is a pleasure to listen to a paper which takes into consideration something a little beyond, and the idea of planting trees by the roadside for the benefit of humanity, is of too much importance to be overlooked. I could go on at great length along this line, but as I have not time I just wanted to express my appreciation before I have to go.
THE PRESIDENT: Has anyone else any suggestions or any general business?
THE SECRETARY: There has been no discussion at all of the filbert, I think. That is a nut that is possibly going to be of great importance in the future. I think it was Mr. Doan who asked me about the filbert and there might be someone here who could give us some information about its possibilities. Perhaps Mr. Reed could tell us something about it.
MR. C. A. REED: Well, I am glad the subject has been brought up but I would rather listen than try to talk. As Mr. Littlepage made clear in his paper yesterday, there has been considerable effort in the eastern states towards the introduction of the filbert, but almost uniformly such attempts have met with failure. About two weeks ago some of us visited Dr. Morris's place and while there we were shown some large European filberts, ten to twelve feet high, bearing heavily. These were not suffering from the effects of the blight at all so far as we could see, and they were right in the district where the native northern filbert is one of the most common of the wild plants. It was quite a revelation to me to see the native filbert or hazels bearing so heavily. Everywhere we went we saw low bushy hazels not over two feet from the ground loaded with immature nuts. I thought there was an opportunity for some nut enthusiast to canvass that territory, and find the best individual plants for propagation. The filbert, it seems to me, offers an unusually inviting field, and unless I am greatly mistaken there is a great field for exploration. Dr. Deming lives in that same section, and he tells us that on his farm the hazels are even more common than at Dr. Morris's place. Dr. Morris agrees with us that there is a fine opportunity for searching for the best varieties. He has done it and has found, I believe, one which he thinks is especially fine. I would be glad to hear from any one else about these nuts.
MR. RIEHL: Mr. President, I have made a little observation of the European and I don't think it will count for very much. I know of trees that were planted in one of our experiment stations. I last saw them three or four years ago and they were twelve or fifteen feet high and bearing very heavy crops. I saw no disease of any kind but it was in the city of Alton and I don't suppose there is a native hazel within miles of it. That may be why they were bearing so well and were exempt from disease. I haven't seen those trees for the last four years and what has happened to them I don't know. I intend to go and see what has become of them.
THE PRESIDENT: Mr. Doan, what is your especial interest in the hazel?
MR. DOAN: I think it offers great possibilities. The different species that we have tried show that. The fact that it grows freely, even though certain branches of it have the blight, which does not at once destroy the whole bush, and the fact that it bears freely and abundantly, I think are points in its favor. A great many persons couldn't wait eight or ten years for a nut tree to bear but could wait a much shorter time. I think this is one good point in favor of the hazels.
THE PRESIDENT: There is no doubt that the hazel offers a very excellent opportunity for study and investigation. There are many varieties of the native hazel that are very fine and it seems to me that therein lies a field of work for this association. There is no information to the productive nut grower of more value than the facts as to what these nuts will do, how they can be produced, how quickly they bear, and what they are worth. We have very little reliable information about the English walnut. When we listened to Mr. Reed last night we were forced to the conclusion that as yet we know nothing about it. There are a few apparently promising English walnut trees throughout the North but there are many things to be taken into consideration before you can recommend those for propagation. It seems to me the hazel offers a field of considerable importance. Has any one else any suggestions to offer?
MR POTTER: This hazel proposition interests almost every member of the association. It seems to me as if we might get at something more definite and instructive and I move that the chair appoint a special committee to investigate the hazel, and report at the next meeting.
A MEMBER: I second the motion.
THE CHAIRMAN: It has been moved and seconded that the chair appoint a committee of three to investigate the hazel or filbert, and report at the next meeting. Are you ready for the question?
MR. RIEHL: I hardly think that will do any good. I believe there is a field where good work can be done but I doubt whether the chair or any one else is able to appoint a committee that can find out much that will be of value between now and our next annual meeting. There are so few superior hazels. I tried for many years to find a native hazel that is worthy of planting. I have heard of some but have been unable to get them. I heard of one and had it promised to me but he has forgotten it, I guess, and I never got it. I know of another that is said to be very good, but the man that has it won't let anybody have it unless he gets five hundred dollars, and there is no man willing to pay that on his say-so that it is a good thing. So we have got nothing to go on for such committee to make a report on. A much better plan would be for this association to offer a prize of a certain sum of money to any one who will report a superior hazel. Let that get in the papers and be talked of so the boys and girls will hear of it and they will contend for the twenty-five or fifty dollars. There are no doubt such fine hazels but the trouble is to find them. I think the best way would be to offer a reward and let them be brought to us. In that way we can accomplish something, but to appoint a committee when we have nothing to go on will do no good.
THE PRESIDENT: There is a great deal in the suggestions of Mr. Riehl. It has been noticed by all of us in nut culture that the individual opinion of the man who has seen only his tree or bush is perhaps not worth much. That is why the data we have on the walnut is unsatisfactory. So much of it comes from the man who has seen only his tree, and does not know what a first class bearing tree is like. The same difficulty would arise, to some extent, in your suggestion, Mr. Riehl, as to offering the prize. That is perhaps one of the best methods to stimulate interest but there is this difficulty in the way, that the nuts must be gathered, and the tree be investigated before it could be properly authenticated. I have had people tell me they have seen pecans from certain trees, that long (measuring on finger). There never was a pecan grew in the world that long. The question before the house is the appointment of this committee. Is there any further discussion? If not those in favor of it make it known by rising. (Two.) Those opposed make it known by rising. (Seven.) The motion is lost. Is there any further business? If not we will stand adjourned sine die.
APPENDIX
THE HISTORY OF THE PERSIAN WALNUT IN PENNSYLVANIA
J. G. RUSH, WEST WILLOW, PENNSYLVANIA
The history of the Persian walnut in Pennsylvania goes back several hundred years. Seed nuts only were brought here by the early German settlers, as steam navigation was unknown at that period. From this mixture of seed from Europe, we have at this time a few varieties worthy of favorable mention. In this connection I will give you my brief history or experiences and observation for the last twenty-nine years.
In 1886 I bought two seedling trees from a local nursery regardless of name or variety at thirty-five cents each. These two trees received equal treatment in culture for ten years, when the so-called Rush tree produced two bushels of fine developed nuts. The other tree about forty feet away has not produced two bushels from the time it was planted to the present date.
The productiveness of the Rush induced me to think, and to investigate the great difference in these two trees. I finally found the Rush to be a simultaneous bloomer whereas the other was just the reverse.
Being a member of the State Horticultural Association I exhibited these nuts from time to time when finally other members became interested in nut culture. Mr. John Engle of the Marietta Nurseries advised me to plant seed from this particular tree and raise seedling trees for sale. I finally did on a small scale only. But I soon found in the young seedlings a taint of black walnut blood, which discouraged me for a further continuance. Later I had correspondence with J. F. Jones, then of Monticello, Fla., who had specialized in the propagation of all nut trees. In 1903 scions were sent to him, and returned as budded trees in 1905, and are now a living monument to the memory of the first propagator of the Rush variety.
The Pennsylvania state nursery inspector first called my attention to the Hall variety in Erie County, Pa., after which a lively correspondence followed and sample nuts were exchanged. In 1910 Mr. J. F. Jones and myself were to see this tree, in order to get its life history. It was said by Mr. Hall that the tree was planted by the early German settlers about forty years ago. The Hall variety is very catchy to the eye on account of its large size. Through the kindness of Mr. Hall we were allowed to cut a few buds, which are bearing trees now at West Willow.
The Holden came first to my attention about four years ago in the New York State Horticultural Association Report, after which a lively correspondence opened and sample nuts with the Rush were exchanged which finally led to the propagation of this prospective variety.
The Nebo is a variety the history of which I traced back to about seventy-five years ago. It was planted by an English iron-master by the name of McCreary. It is said that he gave lodging to a tree agent, whereupon he received this tree as compensation.
The Burlington from Burlington, N. J., is of the Alpine type, and is of great size.
The Lancaster was first called to my attention a year ago. It is said the tree, not the seed, was brought from Germany. This variety is worthy of extensive cultivation, is however also of the Alpine type and very prolific.
In connection with the varieties just mentioned we have also the French varieties, such as the Mayette, Franquette, Cutleaf, Alpine and Parisienne. The French varieties are not tried out in respect to their dependability for the Atlantic coast. They however show hardiness equal to any other variety grown in Pennsylvania.
As regards the late vegetating habit of some Of these varieties enabling them to escape late spring frosts, I see no advantage whatever, as Jack Frost is a privileged character and makes his appearance regardless of time or place.
With the limited efforts I have made thus far in the dissemination of the Persian walnut, I am absolutely confident that the work has just commenced. There will yet be varieties discovered which will compare favorably and may surpass those we have already listed. The best territory to work in I find is the German settlements. They always were noted for their seed distributions in the early history of Pennsylvania. In justice to these frugal people, the Persian walnut should be called The Dutch nut. But the English were the great importers of these nuts and hence the name English walnut. The Germans today as they visit their Fatherland invariably bring a few nuts or trees with them, which keeps up the supply. Of course not all these seedling trees are true to the variety desired. But they say they come from the Homeland, which gives them great contentment.
In the dissemination of these interesting nut-bearing trees I am safe in saying I have visited hundreds of them and mostly single trees of very little importance. The principal complaint is that when the nuts are as large as grapes they drop off from some unknown cause. This is all for the want of proper cross pollenization. The public in general is now getting educated to the importance of planting grafted or budded varieties of known merit, which is attested by the large plantings of the last several years.
My limited experience with grafting large nut trees is that it is not practicable, from the fact that the lower limbs outgrow the grafted ones and eventually smother them and cause them to die out, leaving the tree in a disfigured condition. The better way is to plant several trees of a good pollenizing variety near one another to get best results in bearing.
In this brief history of the nut industry of Pennsylvania and adjacent states, I have said nothing in regard to propagation and culture, knowing that some one else will take up that subject in detail.
Horace Greeley in his prime of life said: "Young man, go west."
The Northern Nut Growers Association says: "Young man, plant a nut tree."
A COMPARISON OF NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CONDITIONS IN THE PROPAGATION OF NUT TREES
J. F. JONES, LANCASTER, PA.
I shall not try to cover the whole subject of propagation or describe methods of budding and grafting, as these will be covered by others and we are to have demonstrations of budding and grafting, which are far ahead of any descriptions that can be given. I will try to compare conditions in the North and South and give some of my experience with the problems that have confronted us.
We have been able to get very satisfactory results with the pecan, either by budding or grafting, under northern conditions. With good scions and good stocks we have been able to get nearly, if not quite, as good results in Pennsylvania as we were able to get in Florida or Louisiana. The growth of the tree is also quite satisfactory. From dormant buds on good stocks we are able to get a growth of four to six feet the first year in the nursery and six to seven feet is not unusual. The growth is also quite stocky and altogether very satisfactory. Any of the methods of propagation as practiced on the pecan in the South are successful in the North, but budding by the patch method has given us the best results. Grafting is quite successful so far as the live or stand is concerned, but, on account of our shorter growing season, the growth is not nearly so satisfactory as that of the dormant bud which, being set the previous summer, is ready to start quickly into growth in the spring and gets the full benefit of our shorter growing season.
The shagbark hickory is essentially a northern tree and can only be propagated satisfactorily in the North. In Florida and Louisiana we could graft the shagbark on pecan stocks with fairly satisfactory results, so far as the live or stand was concerned, but the tree did not take kindly to the climate of the Gulf Coast and made little growth, a number dying out altogether the second and third years after being grafted. We have never gotten very satisfactory results from grafting the shagbark with scions taken from old, bearing trees, but with good scions from young thrifty trees, the shagbark may be grafted with fairly satisfactory results in the northern states. From the nature of the growth, it is not practical to bud the shagbark by the annular or patch bud methods as practiced so satisfactorily on the pecan, but last season (1913) in an experiment we got good results from ordinary shield budding by taking scions from a tree that had matured and ripened its growth up early and setting the buds on young, sappy growth of the pignut hickory, Hicoria Glabra. The scions from which those buds were taken were cut to test patch budding on the shagbark and when it was found that the growth had hardened and the bark would not peel, the buds were cut and inserted by ordinary shield budding, as practiced on the apple, peach, etc. This experiment was made with little or no hope of success, so that my surprise can well be imagined, when the wrapping was removed and it was found that every bud had united with the stocks! These buds have made better growth the present season than have the grafts set the past spring, as might be expected. This may be a freak and we may not be able to again duplicate the results, at least in more extensive practice, but I am inclined to think that we will, under similar conditions. The shagbark, without any manipulation, ripens and hardens up its growth early in the season and it would appear that these conditions could easily be duplicated, at least in average seasons. Young stocks of either the pecan or pignut hickory hold their sap much later than does the shagbark and are in good condition for budding after the shagbark is dormant. We have practiced this method on the chestnut for several years with very satisfactory results. The chestnut may be budded almost as easily as the apple or pear, and with nearly as good results, by ordinary shield budding, by taking scions for budding from an old bearing tree which has matured and ripened its growth up early and setting the buds on young, sappy seedling stocks growing under cultivation in the nursery. The paragon chestnut, especially, ripens its growth up very early when the tree is carrying a good crop of chestnuts, and there is a month, in average seasons, when buds may be taken from it and set on young stocks in the nursery. This condition might be brought about on younger trees from which buds are to be taken by withholding nitrogenous fertilizers and cultivation, or, if necessary, by root pruning. Root pruning should not be too severe as a sudden check on the growth in the growing season might interfere more or less with the storing up of "starch" or "dormant plant food" in the scion. Any condition or conditions that will serve to induce early maturing and ripening of the wood growth on trees from which buds are to be taken will be satisfactory, and by using nitrogenous fertilizers and liberal cultivation on the stocks to be budded, they may be kept in good condition of sap well into September in average seasons. Grafted at the proper time we were able to get good results without any manipulation of the seedling stocks. All that we ever did there was to remove the new growth occasionally to hold the stocks in good condition for grafting and prolong the grafting season, and it was always questionable whether this was a necessary precaution. My idea in keeping the new growth off the stocks till the grafts were set was not to control the sap flow, but to prevent, if it were possible by this means, the exhaustion of the stored up "starch" in the stock, by the new growth. In the northern states, the sap in the walnut stocks, and perhaps to some extent in other nut tree stocks, is inclined to come up in the spring with a rush. Some seasons at least, even before the buds push into growth, when the stocks are cut off for grafting a large number "bleed" or run sap very freely and this may continue several days, flooding and injuring the scion, and exhausting the vitality of the stock. This condition was especially noticeable the past spring, due presumably, to the lateness of the growing season. Making provision for the exit of the surplus sap was usually sufficient in the lower south and, we believed, would be farther north, but with the stronger flow of sap this is not sufficient in the northern states, at least some seasons. An examination of grafts, set on stocks which have bled freely after having been grafted, shows that the stock callouses very slowly, if at all, and the scion, unless it be of very heavy, solid wood, becomes dark colored and sour and the wood soon dies in the cleft, although the scion above this point may remain green for weeks. I am not able, at this time, to give any specific remedy for the correction of this trouble for the reason that I have not worked it out to my own satisfaction as yet, but now that we understand the trouble better, I feel sure that we will be able to correct it in the manipulation of the stocks before they are grafted. Keeping the new growth off the stocks may be found to be sufficient in most seasons, if the grafting is done rather late, but I am of the opinion that a rather severe cutting back of the stocks a few days before they are grafted, if the grafting is done early, will be found the best practice. For later grafting, my opinion is that two or three cuttings, say a week apart, will be better. Root pruning, where it can be practiced to advantage, will be found more effective still. I have never known newly transplanted stocks or those which had the tree digger run under them, to bleed freely when grafted, and we have sometimes gotten a good stand of grafts on such stocks, but such stocks may not always have sufficient sap for the best results in grafting, if they have been recently transplanted or root pruned. Fall planted As a matter of experiment, I want to try budding both the pecan and walnut by this method the present season, but I don't expect any results from walnut buds set in this way. For the information of those who may wish to try this method the present season, I will say that we cut the shagbark buds a little heavier than we cut apple or pear buds. The wood was left in the bud. The bark on the stock was split and the buds inserted just as in any other shield budding. The buds were wrapped very firmly, with waxed muslin, just as we wrap patch buds.
Our success with grafting the English or Persian walnut, under northern conditions, has been variable and not very satisfactory. With good scions and good stocks and other favorable conditions, we have sometimes gotten over 90 per cent to grow, but the stand is more often much below this and the present season we did not average over 25 per cent. The fact that we get good stands of grafts when all conditions are right, is not only encouraging but demonstrates that the English walnut can be grafted under eastern or northern conditions with at least a fair degree of certainty as to results, just as soon as we learn the causes of our failures and are thus able to apply the remedy. Perhaps the greatest drawback to the successful grafting of the English walnut is the difficulty of obtaining good scions. The annual growth of the walnut is much more pithy than that of the pecan or shagbark, and for this reason, only a comparatively small portion of the growth is available for grafting purposes if we are able to select scions that will give the best results. Like the pecan and shagbark, the two-year wood makes the best scions for grafting, provided that the wood has good buds on it, but under our conditions those buds that lie dormant are usually shed off during the summer and few good buds remain that will start quickly into active growth. It is true that adventitious buds will often form where these buds have shed off, and these will push into growth if the stock is kept free from sprouts, but usually too late in the season to make good trees, and keeping the seedling stock free from sprouts when it should be in leafage is more or less weakening and injurious and the grafts, starting into growth late in the season, do not mature and ripen their growth up properly before frost and are quite likely to be injured by early November freezes, unless they have some protection. To graft the English walnut with unvarying and satisfactory results, under northern conditions, we must not only have good scions and good stocks, but we must control the sap flow in the stocks. In Florida and Louisiana the sap came up more gradually in the stocks in the spring, and when or root pruned stocks would probably give the best results, as the sap would probably come up more gradually in the spring and, while the flow would probably be sufficient for the best results, it would not flow freely enough to injure the scion or stock.
We have not experienced any serious difficulty from an extreme flow of sap in pecan stocks, either in the North or South, but we have had grafts set on the pignut hickory fail from this cause. The English walnut may be budded with fair to good results, by the patch method, by selecting good buds on the best matured, round growth, but to propagate the tree economically and satisfactorily it is desirable to both bud and graft, otherwise both stocks and scion wood are wasted.
TOP-WORKING LARGE WALNUT TREES
W. C. REED, VINCENNES, INDIANA
In top-working large native walnut trees to the Persian or English walnut, the first operation is to cut the trees back severely. This should be done while the trees are dormant, preferably in February or early in March. Cut them back two feet or more above where you wish to graft, then cut again to where you want them. This will avoid splitting. Usually we cut back to where the limbs are from two to four inches in diameter. We have cut some back that were six to eight inches with good results. However, limbs this size require careful attention to avoid decay as it takes so long for them to heal over.
Scions for Grafting
Scions for grafting should be cut while perfectly dormant and packed in damp moss or sawdust, being careful not to have it too wet. Paper line the boxes and place in a cool place. Cold storage is much better. Scions cut during the winter and placed in cold storage will come out in good shape for grafting in May, or budding during July or August. Where there is danger of the wood being injured by cold weather it would be well to cut scions in November, before severe cold.
Time for Grafting
Wait until the new growth is well advanced or nearly in full leaf, which is about May 1 to 10, in this latitude.
Methods
Use either the wedge graft or the bark graft. We have had equally good results with each. If any difference it is in favor of the side or bark graft which we prefer because it does not split or mutilate the stock, there is not the chance for decay, and the wounds heal over much quicker. On limbs three to four inches in diameter put in three to four grafts.
Cut the stubs back one to two inches below where they were cut when dormant so you may have a fresh clean cut. Pare the rough bark off until you have a fairly smooth surface for three inches below where the limbs are cut off.
Side or Bark Grafting
For side or bark grafting split the bark with a sharp knife for about two inches where the graft is to be set. Cut your scions with about two buds. Slope the scion all from one side with a long slope so it will fit well to the wood or cambium layer; then trim off a little of the outer bark on the outside lower edge of the scion, just enough to expose the cambium so it will come in contact with the inner side of the bark on the tree.
Wedge Graft
If the wedge graft is used, take a long bladed knife (a corn knife will do) set it sloping on the cut off stock and make a clean cut through the bark first so it will split straight, then raise the handle of the knife and drive the blade into the wood, splitting it as deep as needed, depending on the size of the scion and insert a wooden wedge made from some hard wood. An old broom or hoe handle is good, tapering the wedge from both sides, leaving it thick in the center so it will come out easily after the graft is set by simply tapping lightly from first one side and then the other. In cutting the scion slope from each side with a long slope to fit the split in the stub. The outer edge of the scion should be somewhat thicker than the inner edge so that when the wedge is taken out it will be held firm. Be very careful to see that the cambium of the scion and tree meet on each edge of the scion. Pack all large cracks with tissue paper and wax thoroughly.
Waxing, Tying, Bagging
As soon as the grafts are set, cover the entire wound with grafting wax, being careful to cover the top of the stub well and the sides as far down as the bark is split, and the upper end of the scion. Then place a paper sack over the stub to prevent evaporation and leave this on until the scions start into growth. We do not use any tying material on large limbs because the bark is thick enough to hold the graft in place. However, on smaller trees it will be important to wrap the grafts well.
Grafting Wax
The best grafting wax we have found is composed of the following:
Four pounds resin, one pound beeswax, one-half pint linseed oil and one tablespoon of lampblack. Melt all together and apply with a paint brush, being careful not to have the wax too hot.
After Care
After new growth starts watch it closely every week or ten days and keep all suckers removed until the scion starts into growth. Wherever grafts fail to start the suckers may be left to grow for budding later.
Budding Large Trees
Cut back early the same as for grafting, cover all cuts with grafting wax, let all sprouts grow until time to bud, which is usually August 1 to September 1. Thin out the small, weaker sprouts and bud three or four of the largest ones, setting the bud four to six inches from where the sprout comes out of the stub. Use the patch bud, wrap carefully with waxed cloth, using muslin dipped in melted beeswax, the strips of cloth three-sixteenths to one-fourth inch wide. The following spring, about March 1, cut the sprouts back to about three inches above the bud, remove all other sprouts when new growth starts and keep all suckers removed.
Supports
At this time you will need to put up slat supports to tie the buds to. Take slats one by two inches and twelve feet long. Nail these to the sides of the limbs so they will extend six to eight feet above. Keep buds and grafts tied up every week or ten days during the growing season.
It has been our experience that budding is preferable. However, grafting in the spring and then budding in August gives you two chances the same season.
This same method applies to the pecan and hickory as well as the walnut and if the work is carefully done you will surely be well paid for your work.
INTEREST IN NUT GROWING IN THE INTERMOUNTAIN STATES
DR. L. D. BATCHELOR, UTAH AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
The marked increase in the interest in nut growing throughout the intermountain states is shown by the numerous inquiries on this subject which are directed to this office. There have been very few plantings of commercial orchards, but on every hand there is an interest shown in using nut trees for shade trees. The hardy varieties of Persian walnut are being planted more each year to ascertain the most promising sorts for commercial planting. Larger plantings will no doubt follow when some of these varieties have gained the confidence of the people, for one of the chief drawbacks to nut planting in the past has been the common belief that a semi-tropical climate is essential to the production of such nuts as almonds, pecans and Persian walnuts.
The Utah Agricultural Experiment Station has distributed about one hundred Persian walnut trees to cooeperative planters over the state the past season. Ninety-five per cent of the trees are making a thrifty growth, while a similar planting made in 1912 gives good promise.
The following varieties are included in the experimental lot; Chaberte (grafted on black walnut); Franquette (on black and English walnut); Franquette (Vrooman Strain); Mayette (on English Walnut); Parisienne (on the black walnut); Pomeroy (seedling); Pomeroy (on black walnut); Rush (on black walnut).
A number of seedling trees have been discovered by the writer during the past year, throughout the state. Some of these seedlings are producing a fairly good type of commercial nut. What is more important, however, the success of these seedling Persian walnuts points to the practicability of planting the hardier varieties of this nut in the intermountain states.
REPORT FROM G. H. CORSAN
Location—Toronto.
Season—Winter, 1913-1914; Spring, 1914; Summer, 1914.
Type of season—November and December very mild. The ground was not frozen the least on January 1, 1914. January 12 the coldest day Toronto ever experienced 22 deg. F. below zero. On February 12 it was 18 deg. F. below zero. January, February and most of March very steady cold. Very little snow all winter, none on January 12.
Except those that I smothered by too much care the following seedlings lived through the winter and are alive today: Pecans; pinus edulis; pinus Koriensis; chestnuts; filberts; all the juglans including Californica and Canadian seed of regia; pawpaws; persimmons. My "mountain rose" peaches had not a twig winter killed though my Fitzgeralds, a very hardy peach, had some; this peach may not be as hardy as it is blown up to be. The season has been very dry and this summer many of the Paragon chestnuts died that were not watered. My Pomeroy walnuts are having a struggle to keep good form but I think that I will have a few hardy ones selected from them, as these last two winters have been the most trying on young trees we have ever had, of which fact I am glad. Here at Battle Creek are a dozen of Mr. W. C. Reed's grafted pecans; all are alive and growing strong as are mine in Toronto. I wrote you of the horrible abuse that mine had while in transit and they had a right to die but lived. Pecans grow very late into the fall and do not shed their leaves early so that I feel sure that the wood will harden sufficiently to stand the winter. The next question is, will the nut mature where grapes and peaches grow and just escape the October frosts. I saw many splendid pecans at Burlington, Iowa. Native pecans for seed stock can be procured from there in abundance. The nuts there are long and narrow, but not thick-shelled, and sell retail in the stores for not less than twenty cents a pound. The climate at Burlington has been 35 deg. F. below zero some winters.
I am certain from my observations all over northeastern North America that the pecan has far more possibilities than the English walnut or any other nut unless we can develop a blight proof chestnut.
The north Chinese walnut has been doing wonderfully well in Toronto and those two trees fifteen and seventeen feet high have not a twig killed. They do not bear as early as the Japanese. Their leaves are much longer than the English walnut but the nut is fully as good as the best California, Persian walnut that ever reached the market. Many of the nuts are paper shelled, some burst open at the suture. Their appearance is almost the same as the English but the tree is much hardier, growing at the extreme north of China. Then this is the tree that the nurserymen of Ontario have been selling as "English" walnuts and guaranteeing to be hardy. But as soon as we saw the leaf and the trunk we at once knew them for north Chinese walnuts and upon being told that, the men acknowledged that they were. Just today I have been speaking to a missionary from the extreme north of China and he informs me that they have two feet of ice every winter where these trees grow in abundance with the finest nuts he ever saw. This fact and the fact that really good pecans can grow up north are the two facts that I wish this association to work on in order to get results that are certain of success.
DISTRIBUTION OF PERSIAN ("ENGLISH") WALNUT SEEDLINGS IN MICHIGAN
Attention should be called to the work of Mr. Myron A. Cobb of the Department of Agriculture of the Central State Normal School, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, of which he sends the following outline. Mr. Cobb has consented to send out with the trees a leaflet, to be supplied by this Association, explaining the fundamental principles of nut growing.
It is interesting to note the cost of these seedling trees, one and one-half cents each, including postage.
The success of Mr. Cobb's work shows the readiness of the public for it. Our Association should encourage similar work in other states.
* * * * *
"About five years ago, I began the distribution of walnut seedlings by planting a few seeds in our orchard, and distributed them to the schools of Isabella County. I distributed about five hundred each year, making a total of two thousand five hundred seedlings. This year, the idea has been more widely advertised, and the demand for seedlings has been enormous. I have distributed this year five thousand seedlings and have received orders for about two thousand more which I could not fill because of lack of trees.
"This work was taken up primarily with the idea of distributing walnut seedlings on the farms and incidentally to teach how trees are raised and to correlate the work of the school to the home.
"The trees have been distributed largely by parcel post, in amounts from three to three hundred. The trees have been sold for one and one-half cents each. This covers the original cost of the trees and the postage on the same. Some of the trees have been grown upon our own grounds, but the most of them have been obtained from the D. Hill Nursery Company, of Dundee, Illinois. The distribution has been largely through the schools, but many organizations have interested themselves in the movement, as farmers' clubs, women's clubs, civic improvement leagues, etc. The Women's Club of Pontiac distributed two hundred and seventy-five. We prefer to distribute them through the schools.
"These trees have been distributed to nearly every portion of Michigan, Mr. Weidman, a prominent lumberman, sending one hundred to the Upper Peninsula. Several hundred have been sent to the burned over areas of Northeastern Michigan, some have been planted in the cities and along the roadside, but the most of them have been distributed to the farms. The demand this year exceeded our anticipation. Many farmers and organizations have been greatly interested in securing and distributing the seedlings, and some of the requests for seedlings have been very interesting, in that they show such a great desire on the part of the farmers to secure the trees, and it has been with extreme regret that we were obliged to return their money, because of lack of seedlings.
"This movement seems to be especially interesting in many ways and plans are being made to supply the demand the following season and to extend the work along other practical lines and apparent indications are that our slogan, 'A walnut tree for every farm,' will be a reality."
EXAMPLES OF SOME RECENT CORRESPONDENCE
FARMINGDALE, ILL., August 5, 1914.
I am interested in fruit and nuts of all kinds, but plant only for home use and experimentally.
I believe the chestnut is a better money nut here than the pecan, as natives here bear very sparsely and irregularly although the catkins or male part usually come out in great profusion.
I note that you say "there is probably not much use in trying to grow the pecan or Persian walnut outside the peach area." Here our pecan seems as hardy as the average apple, withstanding 25 deg. below zero or more with little or no injury. I find that the "Andrus" Persian walnut is much hardier than the "Pomeroy" as I planted two small one-year trees that endured the following winter 20 deg. below, with no injury to even terminal buds. So twenty years may show a change of opinion as to the value of the Persian walnut in the Middle West.
The Japanese walnuts here are often injured by winter at 15 deg. below, but there may be hardier types and varieties than those I have tried.
I have never been able to graft the pecan successfully—annual or budding has given me the only success I have had. And in years like this and last, I find it very difficult to make a transplanted grafted pecan live without watering.
I have failed, so far, in finding a practical method to keep chestnuts in good eating and planting condition until spring. If stored in the ground cellar or as peach pits, they mould, if kept in an ordinary building they become too dry.
BENJAMIN BUCKMAN.
SOUTH WATERFORD, ME., November 21, 1914.
DEAR SIR:
I have just read in the last issue of the Rural New-Yorker a very interesting article on nut growing, giving your name.
For several years I have thought that it would be better for people in the New England States to give more attention to nuts than so much to apples, but I have not been in a position to start in with nut trees much until now.
Although 65 years old and somewhat used up with rheumatism I am not ready to give up yet....
When I started on this farm it did not produce a barrel of grafted fruit. There were quite a lot of natural fruit trees that never had been trimmed or cared for in any way. I grafted these trees and set out some from time to time until now the farm produces from 500 to 800 barrels per year.
This year apples at picking time sold slow for $1.00 per barrel for No. 1's, No. 2's not wanted at any price.
I often think that if I had set out a few acres of nut trees 25 years ago they would have been more profit now than the whole 200-acre farm is....
Last spring on account of my lameness and the scarcity and the high price of farm help I sold my large farm and bought a small place.... Last spring I had about two acres of this land plowed up and during the summer thoroughly worked over with the idea of next spring setting it out to nut trees of some varieties that would do best here. Now I do not know anything about nut growing or what varieties best to plant. If you can help me out by putting me in a way to get this information you will confer a great favor.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, BUREAU OF STATISTICS, (Agricultural Forecasts) Office of the County Correspondent.
ISLE LA MOTTE, GRAND ISLE, VERMONT, December 10, 1914.
MY DEAR SIR:
I wish to set out several nut trees next spring here on this island in Lake Champlain. We have lots of hickory nuts, butternuts, hazelnuts and beechnuts growing wild here and Champlain says in his narrative that there were lots of fine chestnuts growing here 300 years ago. Now I want to try some chestnuts, black walnuts, English walnuts, pecans, and almonds. If you can tell me the hardiest varieties of each and where to get trees I shall be greatly obliged. I have my doubts about pecans and almonds but am willing to try them here. I am growing peaches here where they never grew before.
RICHMOND, VA., December 13, 1914.
DEAR SIR:
I am just commencing an enterprise in propagation of nut trees here just north of Richmond. I shall have plenty of time to do some experimental work in planting of unknown varieties and would like to do some such planting. I want any information I can get on varieties of English and black walnuts, hazelnuts, hickories and persimmons, "sloes" and any other varieties of currants. If I am not trespassing too much on your time please put me in touch with parties who can give me information. Please advise me if your association has any publications on the subject.
I am a retired civil engineer and my hobby has been all my life the study of forest trees. I am now in a position to do some planting and I should be very glad to cooeperate with your association. I am here located exactly on the line of demarcation between northern and southern forest growths and I think I have exactly the location for experimental work....
NEW MILFORD, CONN., December 8, 1914.
MY DEAR DR. DEMING:
This morning I am sending, by parcel post, a sample of hickory nuts to compete for the prize which I saw has been offered by the association, of which you are secretary.
My father, while he was living, sent an exhibition of nuts to the Pan-American, also to the St. Louis Fair, and received the highest award given for nuts at both Expositions.
NEW LONDON, CONN., December 3, 1914.
DEAR SIR:
We are all elderly people, lacking energy to cultivate our farm land as closely as we ought. Some of us are interested in nut culture and have suggested that we plant some nuts and watch their growth from the very beginning. Of course, we only wish nuts of the best varieties and easiest culture. We only wish hardy nuts, that do not need grafting, and we prefer those that come into bearing early. We do not wish any of the Mammoth dwarf, Japan chestnut. We bought a nice one, but it will not mature its fruit, and is gradually dying. We find great difficulty in purchasing nuts. Those who have trees for sale, refuse to sell the NUTS.
A person who has a few Japan walnut trees in connection with some other business, very kindly offered to sell us some nuts, and these are all we have been able to purchase so far. There are but very few nuts that we would attempt to try. We wish to find some of the very best of filberts or hazelnuts, that we shall probably cultivate in bush form. We are interested in the hardy, hard shell almonds. Do you think we could do anything with them? I think they do not have to be grafted. Do you know of any species of English walnut or Madeira nut, that are perfectly hardy, and come into bearing early, that would serve our purpose?
I know we are asking quite a favor, for strangers, but if you will kindly assist us a little, we will thank you very much.
BROADWAY METHODIST CHURCH, FARGO, N. D., November 10, 1914.
DEAR SIR:
I saw your statement in the Southern Planter this morning and am writing, not to tell you where choice nut-specimens are to be obtained but to ask a few questions relative to the obtaining the best information possible to the growing of nuts. I have a ten-acre tract about twelve miles straight south of Staunton, Va. When I purchased the tract the chestnut and hickory were thriving. I have had about one half of the property cleared and some trees planted. Among the trees are twelve hardy English walnuts from Green's Nursery, Rochester, N. Y., 6 "Mayo" and 6 "Pomeroy" walnuts from Glen Brothers, Rochester, N. Y. I am interested in nut-culture. I have inquired of Glen Brothers if the Kentish Cob would thrive there. They assure me it will. If there is a chance to make a success of nuts, I would turn my time and thought to the raising of walnuts and Kentish cobs and filberts. What would you advise? If you cannot give me the desired information, kindly give me directions to the one who can. I was brought up among the walnuts and filberts and cob-nuts in the County of Kent, England, and now my thoughts are turning to the delights of earlier days and I intend coming to the Shenandoah Valley in the near future and making my home there....
THE SECRETARY'S REPLY
GEORGETOWN, CONN., November 13, 1914.
MY DEAR MR. ——:
It gives me great pleasure to reply as well as I am able to your letter of November 10th. You are in the position of many thoughtful men of the present day in craving the peace and delight of a life that is nearer to nature. You have also a small tract of land in a favored part of our country, and you have been led to believe, by the statements that you have run across in chance sources, that the returns from nut growing may enable you to attain your ambition.
Our president has a place at Roundhill, Va., not very many miles from yours. He is a professor of something like "Efficiency" in the University of Pennsylvania. He is young, aggressive and very efficient himself. His father was, and he himself is, an orchardist and fruit grower. Both he and I have been for some years working at the problems of nut growing. But it is only this year that we seem to have overcome the difficulties of grafting and budding nut trees. We have the greatest faith in the future success of nut growing, but we do not know how long it will be before we shall know just what varieties of nuts to plant ourselves, least of all to advise others to plant, with any certainty of success. For the man, however, who realizes that nut growing in the North is still in the experimental stage, we have no end of information and advice.
The information you have had from interested sources is misleading. Probably you would not live long enough to get satisfactory results from the seedling trees you might plant, even if such results ever came. To get reasonably prompt and certain results from nut trees it is necessary to grow such trees grafted or budded from trees of known good bearing record, just as the same thing is necessary with the common fruit trees.
Your information about the Kentish cob and the filbert is but half the truth. The shrubs will thrive for a time in almost any place. But they have nowhere in the East been a success because sooner or later they are destroyed by a disease. One of our great nut growing wants is a filbert or hazel of good size and quality that has the blight resistant quality of our native hazel.
My advice to you then would be as follows. If it is your idea to make a living by nut growing on your ten acres in Virginia within a reasonable number of years, I do not advise you to attempt it. If you wish to take up nut growing as offering an occupation of the greatest interest, with opportunity for the solution of problems of great importance to mankind, and a fair promise of eventual money profit to yourself or to your heirs, then I should certainly advise you to take up nut growing.
I would not attempt to grow the hazel or the chestnut at present, except in an experimental way. The nuts of best promise for you are the Indiana or northern pecans and the English walnut. But it requires considerable study of the subject before one may take up the practice of nut growing without the probability of making unnecessary mistakes, and unnecessarily losing time and money in repeating the experiences of others.
The wilful misstatements of some nurserymen, and the ignorance or carelessness of others, has hindered the progress of nut growing. Fortunately we have several nurserymen who have made a study of the subject, who are honorable and truthful men, and on whose statements you may rely. The only possible qualification of this statement that I know of is that an allowance for enthusiasm might be borne in mind without risk of harm. I enclose a list of such nurserymen, accredited by this association.
Your letter seems to call for this extended reply which I hope will be of service to you. If I have left anything obscure that you would like to know about, or if I can assist you in any other way, please let me know.
With the hope that you may be able to take up this most fascinating avocation with pleasure and profit, I am
Very truly yours,
W. C. DEMING.
PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE PERSIAN WALNUT
The secretary herewith presents a preliminary report on the investigation of the Persian walnut. No attempt has been made to collect information about the walnut on the Pacific Coast, which is quite another matter. But the investigation reports very briefly on trees from Canada to Georgia and from Massachusetts to Utah.
The result of the investigation so far is hardly more than a bare catalogue of the trees which the secretary has been able to locate, and is intended simply as an aid to further investigation. It is now published with the hope that members and others may become informed of Persian walnut trees that it may be possible for them to locate, observe and report upon. It is manifestly impossible for any one person, unless some paid agent of the government or other institution, to investigate many of these trees personally, they are scattered over such a wide area. Correspondence is usually unsatisfactory and personal investigation is the only way to get good results.
Probably only a small part of all the existing trees is here catalogued. But among them, and among the others that will come to light in the constantly widening investigation by an increasing number of interested persons, will certainly be found varieties of merit and adaption to different sections of the country.
As the meeting next year at Rochester is to give especial attention to the Persian walnut it is to be hoped that members and others will make special efforts to send to the meeting specimen nuts and reports of trees.
THE PERSIAN WALNUT
CANADA
Brantford—Dr. D. S. Sager. Knows at least 50 trees. Is top working native walnuts and other work. Grimbsy—H. K. Griffith. Bearing tree or trees. Grimbsy—Louisa Neller. Bearing tree or trees. Grimbsy East—Beverley Book. Bearing tree or trees. St. Catherins—Miss Alice Berger, 251 Queenston St. Several bearing trees. One tree 100-200 pounds annually. St. Catherins—Harper Secord, R. 2. Twenty-eight young seedlings. St. Catherins—James Titherington. Bearing tree or trees. St. Catherins—J. J. Fee, Niagara St. Bearing tree or trees. St. Catherins—F. D. Solvyne, Carleton St. Bearing tree or trees. Toronto—G. H. Corsan, University of Toronto. Many young walnut and other nut trees. "Hundreds of thousands being planted in Niagara Peninsula."
NEW YORK
Chappaqua—F. M. Clendenin. Just bearing few nuts after 8 years. Lockport—A. C. Pomeroy. Bearing orchard, seedlings. North Avon—Adelbert Thompson. Bearing orchard, seedlings, 225 trees. Hilton—E. B. Holden. Bearing trees. Rochester—B. F. Whitmore, 520 Park Ave. Three bearing trees. Holley—W. E. Howard. Four bearing trees. Knows of others. "Hundreds of trees." Canandaigua—Bradley Wynkoop. Bearing tree. Brockport—Marcus Cook, 90 Holley St. "Nearly 100 bearing trees within 5 miles of Brockport." Fairport—Pickering Bros., Some Pomeroys. Fairport—N. A. Baker. Victor—E. Y. Shilling. Bearing tree. Victor—A. B. Wood. Bearing tree. Victor—Josiah Snyder. Bearing tree. Watkins—Write E. C. Gabriel, Rock Stream. Tree reported by Prof. Corbett at N. Hector, 2 or 3 more east side of lake. Earlville—Francisco I. L. Mulligan. Twenty-nine Pomeroys and others. Hoosick Halls—A. A. Baker, R. 2. Knows of bearing tree near Long Island. Port Jefferson—Joseph Schriever. "Fine Specimen." Huntington—Historical Society. "Fine Specimen." Between Huntington and Centerport, on Gallows Hill, old Geo S. Conklin place, occupied by "Peachy," as reported by Uncle Jerry Wockers of the Ithaca Journal office. Bearing tree. Oyster Bay—Joseph H. Sears. Bearing tree, reported by Henry Hicks. Oyster Bay—Mrs. W. H. Burgess. Bearing tree, reported by Henry Hicks. Glen Cove—John T. Pratt. Bearing tree, reported by Henry Hicks. Glen Cove—W. L. Harkness (Dosoris). Bearing tree, reported by Henry Hicks. Woodbury—L. Piquet. Bearing tree, reported by Henry Hicks. Roslyn—Admiral Aaron Ward. Bearing tree, reported by Henry Hicks. Hempstead—Rev. Chas Snedaker, St. George's Rectory. Bearing tree, reported by Henry Hicks. New York City, Westchester—Dr. Deming. Three Morris trees.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Washington—Barnes, Weaver, Kaingler, Stabler and other trees.
DELAWARE
Wilmington—Dr. Rumford. Smyrna—Walter L. Marks. Magnolia—J. B. Tisdale. One or more bearing trees. Reported by E. B and J. M. Reed, Fredonia. Millsboro—G. L. Ellis. Twenty miles away some trees.
NORTH CAROLINA
Carthage—I. W. Williamson. Few young trees. Carthage—John A. McLeod, R. 3. Pomona—J. Van Lindley. Several trees near Southern Pines.
OHIO
Cincinnati—I. B. Johnston. "About 50 trees near Cincinnati." Gypsum—H. G. Miller, of Wm. Miner and Son, Elmwood Fruit Farm. Two trees, 20 years old. Also young Pomeroy trees. "Several very large bearing trees within a few miles of here." Dayton—Fred Kircher, 221 S. McDonough St. Amherst—O. F. Witte, R. 2. Bearing tree. Middletown—Levi Leonard. One hundred seedlings. Knows of old trees in Lancaster Co., Pa.
NEW JERSEY
Lumberton—C. S. Ridgeway. "Peerless Paper Shell," 25 years, 50-100 pounds. Paterson—Thos. Rodgers, 236 W. 25th St., W. End. Bearing tree. Salem—Weber; write D. Harris Smith, Att'y. Rep. J. L. Doan. Haddonfield—J. Hutchinson. Raritan—Philip Lindsley, Box 350. Bearing tree. Flemington—Rev. Dr. Sonne. Bearing tree. Marlton—C. D. Barton. Knows good bearing trees. Moorestown—Charles Haines. Bearing tree. Delanco—Frank Jones. Bearing tree.
VIRGINIA
Williamsburg—D. S. Harris, Box 416, 33 Febrey. "Grafted." Williamsburg—J. A. Bechtel, R. 2. Mint Springs—Williams place. Two trees; rep. Am. Nut. Jour. 8, 14, p. 39. Lynchburg—Crockett. Roslyn—R. S. Carter, Box 41. Three trees. Emporia—H. W. Weiss. "Fifty trees on different farms; English, Japanese and black."
MARYLAND
Sandy Spring—Ava M. Stabler. Colton's Point—James K. Jones. See Circular of J. F. Jones. "Eight or ten bearing trees." Forest Hill—Wilmer P. Hoopes. Churchville—Alexis Smith. "Alexis." Sharon—Mrs. S. J. Poleet. "Sheffield." Berkeley—J. T. Smith. "Smith." Janettsville—David Hildt. "Beder." Vale—Kate Hooker. "Hooker." Baltimore—Franklin-Davis Nurseries. Princess-Anne—Ida M. Lankford. Bearing trees. Cooperstown—L. J. Onion, P. O. Sharon. "Sir Clair."
MASSACHUSETTS
Boston—Mrs. Schultz, 335 Cornell St., Roslindale, Boston. Bearing tree. Newburyport—Reported by C. F. Knight, Rowley. Bearing tree. Winchester—Brackett (Bro. of G. B. Brackett). Bearing trees.
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Keene—Reported by A. C. Pomeroy. Pomeroy trees. Newmarket—Alfred C. Durgin. Six Pomeroy, 2 Rush, "Supposed to be grafted." Enfield—Forest Colby. Some trees.
MICHIGAN
Mt. Pleasant—Myron A. Cobb, Central State Normal School. Has been distributing thousands of walnut seedlings. Coloma—W. C. Reed, Vincennes, Ind. Almont—F. P. Andrus. Bearing tree and seedlings. Augusta—Orville I. Miller. Buds from Andrus.
ALABAMA
Huntsville—Mr. Mayhew, Westchester, New York City. Reports tree.
TENNESSEE
Greenville—Wm. H. Brown, 516 Main St. Reports 3 trees, El. 1500.
GEORGIA
Sharpe—Paul Dyer. Reported by Prof. McHatton.
IDAHO
Boise—S. A. Gehman. Local bearing trees. C. C. Vincent, Ag. Exp. Sta. Moscow.
UTAH
Lehi—Mrs. J. T. Winn. Several trees. Salt Lake City—J. T. Harwood (brother of above). Many bearing trees. Leon D. Batchelor, Horticulturist, Ag. Exp. Sta. Logan.
CORRESPONDENTS AND OTHERS INTERESTED IN NUT CULTURE
CALIFORNIA
D. P. T. MacDonald, Horticultural Inspector, 418 20th Street, Oakland
CANADA
Albert H. Lawrence, Edmonton, Alberta, Box 142
COLORADO
Dr. J. W. Benners, Silver Plume Albert E. Mauff, Secretary State Board of Horticulture, Denver
CONNECTICUT
P. G. Wallmo, Stony Creek, Box 314 Royal J. Barter, Farmington Lester S. White, Collinsville Noah Wallace, Farmington C. K. Decherd, Meriden, Box 464 F. Perry Hubbard, care of The Rogers & Hubbard Co., Middletown Clarence T. Hatch, New Milford Chester Hart, Barkhamstead Paul Steinmann, Waterbury, R. 3 Charles E. Chester, New London, Box 593
DELAWARE
M. L. Anderson, Lincoln City
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
William A. Taylor, Department of Agriculture
FLORIDA
C. E. Browne, Glen Saint Mary
IDAHO
Thomas Judd, St. George Crystal Springs Orchard Co., Twin Falls John Gourley, Filer Mr. Squires, Buhl, Rio Vista Fruit Ranch
ILLINOIS
Jacob Wyne, Lintner Miss Maude Davidson, Lewiston L. H. Calloway, Chapin Benj. Buckman, Farmingdale William E. Walsh, Sparta, R. 4. Geo. R. Hemingway, 121 Marion Street, Oak Park Mrs. R. Matthews, McClure Mrs. Ida L. Rice, Disco Chas. E. Graves, University of Illinois Library, Urbana Mrs. Truman Sweet, Durand Geo. Findlay, 102 So. Market Street, Chicago J. C. Gibbs, Elmwood Dr A. W. Foreman, White Hall Editor Journal American Medical Association, 535 Dearborn Street, Chicago
INDIANA
John F. Woods, Utility Farm, Owensville, R. 19 W. E. McElderry, Princeton Nursery, Princeton H. J. Berendes, 509 E. Pennsylvania Street, Evansville Vickery Bros., Evansville Jarodsky & Co., Mt. Vernon Henry Titus, Grand View J. W. Jeffries, Carbon Indiana Pecan Co., 234 3d Street, Mt. Vernon H. B. Hill, Knightstown, Henry Co. R. R. Katterjohn, Boonville E. Hicks Trueblood, Salem, R. 9, Box 62 H. B. Halloway, 1132 No. Illinois Street, Indianapolis D. W. McFarland, No. Manchester Thomas L. Kerth, 408 Second Avenue, Evansville Leo H. Fisher, Huntingburg Harry Gieseke, Patoka C. A. Weilbrenner, Mt. Vernon J. W. Gleichman, Evansville H. M. Thurber, Rockport Dr. F. L. Davis, 209 Dover Street, Evansville John F. Woods, Owensville L. P. Dorr, Howell, R. 9 Clarence Cook, Indianapolis Robert J. Tracewell, Evansville W. A. Graham, Enterprise J. C. Haines, Lake W. A. Taylor, Oaktown Chas. F. Hartzmetz, Evansville J. W. Strassell, Rockport
IOWA
Wendell P. Williams, Danville
KANSAS
H. S. Baker, Secretary Winfield Nursery Co., Winfield G. H. Dodge, 1000 Kearney Street, Manhattan J. H. Brown, Gridley
KENTUCKY
J. W. Blunk, Maceo James Speed, Editor Farm and Family, Louisville H. C. Hargis, Hebbardsville C. F. Kleiderer, Henderson Professor Carmody, Agricultural Experiment Station, Lexington
MAINE
G. I. Hamlin, So. Waterford E. F. Hitchings, Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Orono
MARYLAND
Mrs. W. C. Taylor, 700 N. Broadway, Baltimore I. S. Winfree, Salisbury Frank J. Hoen, 213 Courtland Street, Baltimore Wm. E. Little, Westminster Mrs. W. C. Taylor, 700 No. Broadway, Baltimore
MASSACHUSETTS
Capt. William H. Dole, N. Dartmouth, R. 4 Prof. W. D. Clark, Department of Forestry, Agricultural College, Amherst Leavitt Perham, Ludlow Center Orrin C. Cook, Milford Chas. Ripley, 173 Harvard Street, Dorchester Harris E. Chace, Clifford Wilfred Wheeler, Secretary State Board of Agriculture, 136 State House, Boston Chas. R. Green, Librarian Agricultural College, Amherst John H. Chard, 263 Salem Street, Bradford Prof. W. D. Clark, Department of Forestry, Agricultural College, Amherst
MICHIGAN
J. Arthur Whitworth, Michigan Desk Co., Grand Rapids Dr. H. M. Dunlap, Battle Creek William L. Davies, 1780 St. Aubin Avenue, Detroit L. O. Cook, Litchfield Miss Marie Palmer, Plymouth, R. 2 Daniel A. Edwards, Newaygo B. W. Madill, Linden J. J. Robinson, Lamont Geo. W. Bolton, Sparta, R. 20
MISSISSIPPI
G. H. Sadler, Columbia, R. F. D., care of Yale Cany. C. J. Hayden, Assistant Professor Horticulture, Agricultural College
MISSOURI
William A. F. Hain, 22 Tiffin Avenue, Ferguson Frank Wild Floral Co., Sarcoxie F. A. Chambers, Sherrill E. A. Ester, 1102 Rogers Avenue, Springfield
MONTANA
J. L. Pfeiffer, Joliet
NEW HAMPSHIRE
C. W. Hoitt, 24 Odd Fellows Building, Nashua NEW JERSEY
Thomas Rodgers, 236 W. 25th Street, Paterson J. N. Jarvie, Beemerville Dr. W. H. Pounds, Paulsboro H. G. Taylor, Secretary State Horticultural Society, Riverton Nobel P. Randel, The High School, Montclair C. C. Doorly, Sussex, R. 2 Joseph S. Smith, Burlington, R. 3 Lemuel Black, Hightstown Herman Tice, Westwood Philip Lindsley, Raritan, Box 350 Rev. Dr. Sonne, Flemington C. D. Barton, Marlton Chas. Haines, Moorestown Frank Jones, Delanco John Hutchinson, Haddonfield
NEW YORK
Dr. William B. Jones, 525 Lake Avenue, Rochester F. H. Pough, Union Sulphur Co., 17 Battery Place, New York City W. V. S. Thorne, V. P. Union Pacific System, 165 Broadway, New York City B. F. Butler, The Warrington, New York City Fred Mackintosh, 3 Gillespie Street, Schenectady J. Wallace Bush, Central Valley Frank O. Ayres, 1 Madison Avenue, New York City Peter H. Beller, Gallupville Jordan Philip, Cashier First National Bank, Hudson W. Robert Bruce, Brick Church Institute, Rochester O. N. Fisher, 3390 Park Avenue, New York City Hayward Greenland, care of Wilbur Van Dayer, White Memorial Building, Syracuse A. Davis, 1240 Putnam Avenue, Brooklyn R. W. Tompkins, Brewster, R. 2 Ralph Hammersley, 88 Helderberg Avenue, Schenectady S. Klaussner, Ferndale, Sullivan County C. C. Sanders, 206 Broadway, New York City M. R. Ford, Dundee F. Gilmore, Piffard Mrs. S. T. Smith, Bath Isaac Conover, Randall E. H. Kelly, State Road, Plattsburgh, R. 2 Morris M. Whitaker, Nyack Fred Blizzard, Westtown Wm. T. Laing, 716 Flatiron Building, New York City Frank Hyde, Peekskill, Box 177 Mrs. J. Robert Tice, Marlborough, R. F. D. Miss Lathrop, care of Alex D. Lathrop, Stockport E. L. Overholser, State College of Agriculture, Ithaca Trueman's Farm, Lake Katrine C. H. Hechler, Harbor Hill, Roslyn Everett C. Foster, Sagaponack, L. I.
NEW MEXICO
F. V. Pattison, Clovis
NORTH CAROLINA
Buffalo Nursery Co., McCullers C. W. M. Hess, Manager Audubon Nursery, Wilmington C. H. Gochnauer, New Bern, R. 2 Jesse M. Howard, 413 No. Kerr Street, Concord
OHIO
S. Prentiss Baldwin, Leslie Block, Water and Decatur Streets, Sandusky Miss Minnie Lehrer, 812 Osborne Street, Sandusky Chas. A. Clark, Ravenna, R. 2 E. L. Moseley, 125 Vine Street, Sandusky Geo. T. Bishop, 1000 Scofield Building, Cleveland J. W. Peters, Peters Buggy Co., Reynoldsburg Mrs. C. C. Arms, St. Clair Road, Euclid D. S. Burch, Assistant Editor Farm and Fireside, Springfield William N. Neff, Martel, Box 31 H. M. Farnsworth, Brooklyn Bank Building, Cleveland C. M. Knight, 129 South Union Street, Akron H. A. Lockwood, The Lockwood-Owen Farm Co., Port Clinton N. G. Buxton, Johnstown Mrs G. W. Henderson, Cadiz, R. 6 J. W. Flaherty, Scio, R. 3 A. M. Preston, Vanatta, R. D. Box 122 G. L. Hyslop, Deshler T. A. Dilley, Duncan Falls Henry Bannon, Portsmouth F. H. Wickey, Greenwich, R. 1 R. P. Fowler, Jr., Coshocton, R. 4 Leroy V. Ewing, Cambridge, R. 5 Prof. W. J. Green, Horticulturist, Agricultural Experiment Station, Wooster Wm. Schiller, Poland, R. F. D. E. Gill, Mechanicsburg W. J. Miller, 134 Garvin Avenue, Elyria W. P. Deppen, Tiffin, R. 1, Box 20
OREGON
W. A. Orr, Milton
PENNSYLVANIA
Dr. Leedon-Sharp, 4041 Catherine Street, Philadelphia Paul Mease, Pleasant Valley J. A. Calderhead, Wilmerding R. P. Wright, Reed Mfg. Co., Erie John L. Hanna, Manager River Ridge Farm, Franklin Elam G. Hess, Mannheim, Box 232 Chester Rick, Girard College, Philadelphia Sam. P. Moyer, Meyerstown John Dierwechter, Richland Joseph T. Huss, Wellsville W. F. Beers, Three Springs Editor Medical Council, Philadelphia S. B. Detwiler, Chestnut Blight Commission Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia A. Y. Satterthwaite, Swarthmore Donald Hutcheson, Warriors Mark
SOUTH CAROLINA
T. B. Ellis, Jr., Lyndhurst
TEXAS
O. A. Triplett, 215 No. Elm Street, Fort Worth
UTAH
L. M. Gillilan, High School, Salt Lake City J. T. Harwood, High School, Salt Lake City Mr. Calahan, Calahan's Book Store, Salt Lake City Miss Maud Harwood, Lehi Joseph Broadbent, Utah Lake Irrigation Co., Lehi Jesse Knight, Provo Carl Isacson, Brigham City W. O. Knudson, Brigham City William Zollinger, Providence E. D. Ball, Logan Antone Pherson, Logan A. R. Hurst, No. Logan Sam Judd, St. George John Stuki, Santa Clara Nelson Fenton, Pleasant Grove Richard Brerton, Provo Charles Stay, Calders Station, Salt Lake Mrs. J. T. Winn, Lehi Dr. T. B. Beatty, Salt Lake City J. F. Knudson, Brigham City J. Fred Odell, Woods Cross Joseph A. Smith, Providence
VERMONT
Mrs. Charles A. Lewis, Grafton Arthur H. Hill, Isle La Motte
VIRGINIA
Warren Tomlinson, Farmville R. G. Bickford, Lee Hall Farm, Newport News Mrs. W. S. Mott, Dixondale R. G. Bickford, Newport News James H. Denmead, West Point, Box 50 John J. Rhodes, Potomac View Farm, Sterling R. M. Fontaine, Richmond, care of Chesapeake and Potomac Telegraph Co., 7th and Grace Streets |
|