|
The religion of Jesus, therefore, is one of love alone. The divine nature consists in love, and the impulse which religion communicates, is simply that which proceeds from being loved and loving. And a religion of love finds the way, as no other can, to make man free, to unseal his energies, and to lead him upwards to the best life. The appearance of such a religion forms the most momentous epoch of human history. He who brought it forward must occupy a unique position in the estimation of mankind. It can never be superseded.
It is no doubt the case that the doctrine of Jesus was not in all respects new. The ideas of the prophets live again in him; his followers have always found many of the Jewish Psalms to be perfectly suited to their experience. Jesus lived in the faith of Israel, and considered that he had come only to make that faith better understood, and to free it from improper accretions. What was new was his own person. His great work was that he embodied his teaching in a life which expressed it perfectly. It is far short of the truth to say that there was no inconsistency between what he taught and his own conduct. His life is a demonstration, in every detail, of the effects of his religion; all flows with the utmost simplicity, and even as a matter of necessity, out of the truth he taught. What he preached was, in fact, himself; he was himself living in the kingdom of God, to which he called others to come; he knew in his own experience what it was to live as a child with the Father in heaven, and to view all persons, all things, all duties, in the light of that intercourse. All his acts and words flowed from the same spring in his own inner experience. In no other way could his life shape itself than as it did, and he saw with perfect clearness what men must be, and on what terms they must live together when God and they were as Father and children to each other. What he thus knew he lived, as if no laws but those of the kingdom of heaven had any authority for him, and so he presented to the world that living embodiment of the true religion, which has been the main strength of Christianity. Jesus announces a new union of God with man, a union in which he himself is the first to rejoice, but which all may share along with him; and hence his person counts for more in his religion than that of any other religious founder in his, and necessarily becomes an object of faith to all who enter the communion. The doctrine does not produce its specific effect apart from the person of Jesus. Because in him alone they know the truth which brings them peace, his followers regard him, in a way which has no parallel in any other religion, as their Saviour.
But this name is given to him by his followers, as it is claimed by himself, for another reason also. Jesus was more than a teacher. He felt a power to be present in him which was able to supply all needs and to comfort all sorrows; he did not shrink from summoning all who were weary and heavy laden to come to him, nor from undertaking to give them rest. Keenly alive to the sufferings of others, and able to perceive even those sufferings of which they were not themselves conscious, he felt it to be his mission to deal with the sadder side of human life; he was a physician sent to the sick, a shepherd seeking the lost sheep. It was among the poor and the sick, and even among the outcasts of society, in whom the sense of need was strongest, that he felt himself most at home and most able to fulfil his calling. Thus the motive of compassion enters strongly into all he said and did: but the compassion is not hopeless in this case as in the similar case of Gautama (see chapter xx.), nor is the cure recommended for the ills of humanity that of withdrawal from mankind or of forgetfulness. Here there is a belief in God. The compassion from which the religion flows is not as in the case of Gautama, that of a preacher who has ceased to trust in any heavenly power; it is announced as existing first of all in the heart of God Himself. God can do all things, and in his yearning pity for his children has sent his representative to assure them of his sympathy and to comfort them in their sorrows. With Jesus therefore no evil is so great as not to admit of a positive cure; he feels the remedy of all human ills to be present in his own heart, and so he appears as the Messiah, not such a Messiah as his countrymen looked for, but as the true Messiah, in whom all human wants are met, and all human hopes fulfilled. The cure which he announces for all ills consists in devotion to the will of the Father in heaven. To give oneself unreservedly to the labour of realising the purposes of the heavenly Father in one's own heart and in the world, is to rise above all cares and sorrows; enthusiasm in the Father's service is the sovereign remedy. To one who believes in the Father, and seeks to live as his child, no despair is possible. To be engaged in his business is at all times the highest happiness, and his kingdom is assuredly coming, though man has still the privilege of working for it,—the kingdom in which all darkness and evil will be put away.
We have indicated the chief points which in a scientific comparison of Christianity with other religions appear to constitute its distinctive character; and we have sought to make our statement such as the reasonable adherent of other religions will feel to be warranted. The points are these. Christianity is a religion of freedom, it is a system of inner inspiration more than of external law or system, it is embodied in the living person of its founder, in which alone it can be truly seen; and the founder is one who is living himself in the relation to God to which he calls men to come, and feels himself called and sent to be the Saviour of men.
It is impossible in this work to treat Christianity on the same scale as the other religions; but the question of its universalism must necessarily receive attention. Jesus himself did not expressly say that his religion was for all men. It was his immediate aim to bring about the renewal of the faith of his countrymen, and to give it a more spiritual character; and some of his followers considered that he had aimed at nothing more than this. But he formed a circle of disciples and adherents, which afterwards came to be the Christian Church, and he attached no ritual condition whatever to membership in that community. Nay, more; by his repudiation of the Jewish system of tradition he showed that the Jewish laws of ritual purity were not binding upon his disciples, and the further inference could readily be drawn, that one could enter the Kingdom without being a Jew at all. The strong missionary impulse of the infant religion brought it very early in contact with Gentile life, and the question soon arose, whether those who refused to become Jews could yet claim a share in the Messiah. It was the task of the Apostle Paul to work out the theory of the universalism of Christianity, and after some conflict the principle was recognised that in the Church all racial differences disappear; "in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek." This controversy once settled—and a few years sufficed to settle it—the new religion was free to spread in all directions. It spread rapidly; the gospel was very simple and imposed no burdensome conditions, and it soon proved itself to be capable of striking root in any country. The Apostle Paul was the first great theologian of the Church; but his doctrine, as will happen in such a case, does not in all points spring out of the nature of the religion itself. The Pauline theology is an attempt to reconcile the facts of Christianity and especially that great stumbling-block to the Jews, the death of the Messiah, with the requirements of Jewish thought. Instead of seeing in the death of Christ, as the older apostles at first did, a perplexing enigma, St. Paul saw in it the principal manifestation of the compassion of the Saviour, and the great purpose for which he had come into the world. He concentrated attention on Christ's death and made the cross rather than the doctrine of the Messiah the burden of his teaching. To understand Paul we must distinguish between his religion and his theology. His religious position is essentially the same as that of Jesus himself; with him, too, the new religion is that of father and child, and of the consequences which inevitably flow from such a union. But the movement of thought which began at the moment of the crucifixion, the concentration of Christian faith and love on the person of the Saviour, was now complete. The figure of the Crucified with its powerful tragic attraction, and with its deep lessons of conquest by self-surrender, of life by dying, remained from St. Paul onwards, in the centre of the faith.
The world of the early centuries was in great need of a religion, and Christianity supplied the place which was vacant. Brought in contact, in the great ocean of the Roman Empire where all currents met, with religions and philosophies of every kind, it proved best suited to the task of supplying an inspiration for life, uniting together different classes of men and schools of thought. But in the wide arena of the Empire it received as well as gave, and in its encounters with strange rites and doctrines it also put on many a strange aspect. It became the heir of the thoughts and aspirations of a hundred empires; all the pious sentiments that flowed together from every quarter of the world helped to enrich its doctrine, and to make it the great reservoir it is of all the tendencies and views, even those most contrary to each other, which are connected with religion. Its institutions are of diverse origin. From the Jews it received its earliest Bible, for the Christians had at first no sacred books but those of the old covenant, and its weekly festival, though the day was changed. Its God was the God of the Old Testament, and its Saviour was the Messiah of Jewish prophecy, so that it was a continuation of the Jewish religion, and the attempts which were made by early Gnostics to dissolve this tie were soon forgotten.
From Greece it received much. The world it had to conquer was Greek, and the conquest could only take place by an accommodation to Greek thought and to Greek ways. In the end of chapter xvi. we spoke of the second Greek religion which arose under the influence of philosophy, and found its way wherever Greek culture spread. In this great movement, Christianity found a preparation for its coming in the Greek world, without which its spread must have been much more doubtful. In the Graeco-Roman religion the advances which appear in Christianity are already prefigured. Thought has been busy in building up a great doctrine of God, such a God as human reason can arrive at, a Being infinitely wise and good, who is the first cause and the hidden ground of all things, the sum of all wisdom, beauty, and goodness, and in whom all men alike may trust. Greek thought also found much occupation in the attempt to reach a true account of man's moral nature and destiny. Both in theory and in practice many an attempt was made to build up the ideal life of man, and thus many minds were prepared for a religion which places the riches of the inner life above all others. The Greek philosopher's school was a semi-religious union, the central point of which was, as is the case with Christianity also, not outward sacrifice but mental activity. It is not wonderful therefore if Christian institutions were assimilated to some extent to the Greek schools. It has recently been shown that the celebration of the Eucharist came very early to bear a close resemblance to that of a Greek mystery, and that there is an unbroken line of connection between the discourse of the Greek philosopher and the Christian sermon. In some of the Greek schools pastoral visitation was practised, and the preacher kept up an oversight of the moral conduct of his adherents. While Christianity certainly had vigour enough to shape its own institutions, and may even be seen to be doing so in some of the books of the New Testament, the agreement between Greek and Christian practices amounts to something more than coincidence.
It was towards the end of the second century that the alliance between Christianity and the Greek world was finally ratified. Till then belief and practice were determined mainly by custom and tradition; but now these were to give way to definite laws and settled institutions. There came to full development, about the period we have mentioned, a highly-organised system of church government, a canon of sacred books of Christian origin, and a creed in which the beliefs of Christians were drawn together in one statement. It cannot be denied that the elaborate external forms with which the religion of Jesus was thus invested went far to change its spirit also. But this happens to every religion which reaches the stage of organising itself in order to continue in the world and to rule permanently in human thought and in human society. No external forms can adequately express living religious ideas; and yet there must be external forms in order that religious ideas may be perpetuated. The ministers of the new truth inevitably rise in dignity till they grow into a hierarchy. That truth inevitably seeks to establish itself as scientifically true, and with the aid of the ruling philosophical tendency of the day clothes itself in a view of the universe and in a creed. Thus the essence of Christianity came to consist not in loving the Master and following him in faith and love, but in upholding the authority of the Church, receiving her sacraments, and believing various metaphysical and transcendental statements. Here also a hard shell is formed round the spiritual kernel of the religion which, if it is fitted to preserve the latter in rude and stormy times, is also fitted to confuse and also apt to conceal it.
In each of the countries to which it came, Christianity adopted what it could of the religion formerly existing there. The old religions of these lands were not all alike, and hence it came to pass that as the language of Rome was transformed in various ways, and passed into the different yet cognate tongues of the Romance nations, so the religion of the Empire, combining with various forms of heathenism, passed into several national religions, the differences of which are at least as conspicuous as their similarity. In Italy Christianity appears to be a system of local deities, each village worshipping its own Madonna or saint. In Holland worship consists almost entirely of preaching. In other countries the ritual and the intellectual elements of religion are blended in varying proportions; and the former heathenism of each land is also to be traced in many a popular observance and belief. So great is the variety of the religions of Europe, not to mention that of the negroes or the Shakers of America, that many have doubted whether they ought all to be considered as branches of one faith, or whether they would not more fitly be regarded as so many national religions which have all alike connected themselves with Christianity. Against this there is to be urged in the first place that as a matter of history they are all undoubtedly offshoots of the religion of Jesus. It may also be urged that wherever the name of Jesus is named, his ideas must to some extent be present, however much they are obscured and prevented from operating by lower modes of view. The Christianity of no country ought to be judged by the attitude of its most ignorant or even of its average adherents; and in every land where Christianity prevails, an influence connected with religion is at work, which makes for the emancipation and elevation of the human person, and for the awakening of the manifold energies of human nature. This, as we saw, is the immediate and native tendency of the religion of Jesus; it opens the prison doors to them that are bound; it communicates by its inner encouragement an energy which makes the infirm forget their weaknesses, it fills the heart with hope and opens up new views of what man can do and can become. It is this that makes it the one truly universal religion. Islam, it is true, has also proved its power to live in many lands, and Buddhism has spread over half of Asia. But Buddhism is not a full religion, it does not tend to action but to passivity, and affords no help to progress. Islam, on the other hand, is a yoke rather than an inspiration; it is inwardly hostile to freedom, and is incapable of aiding in higher moral development. Christianity has a message to which men become always more willing to respond as they rise in the scale of civilisation; it has proved its power to enter into the lives of various nations, and to adapt itself to their circumstances and guide their aspirations without humiliating them. A religion which identifies itself, as Christianity does, with the cause of freedom in every land, and tends to unite all men in one great brotherhood under the loving God who is the Father of all alike, is surely the desire of all nations, and is destined to be the faith of all mankind.
A bibliography of the recent study of Christianity would be far too extensive for this book. An excellent statement on the subject will be found at the hands of Professor Sanday in the Oxford Proceedings, vol. ii. p. 263, sqq.
CHAPTER XXIII CONCLUSION
It will not be expected that the result of the great movement traced in the chapters of this work can be summed up in a few words. We set out with a definition of our subject which we said could only be fully verified after religion had accomplished its growth and had fully unfolded its nature. We also set out with the assumption that all the religion of the world is one, and that it exhibits a development which is in the main continuous, from the most elementary to the highest stages. We shall not now attempt to justify by argument that definition or that assumption. The history which we have sought to place before the reader must itself be the proof of them. All that can be done in bringing this work to a close is to point out one great line of development, which may be recognised more or less distinctly in the growth of each religion, and may therefore be held to be characteristic of religion as a whole. No doubt the growth of religion, as of other human activities, has many sides and aspects, but perhaps it may be possible to specify the central line of growth in which the explanation of all the subsidiary and parallel forward movements is to be found.
It was stated in our first chapter that religion is the expression of human needs with reference to higher beings who are supposed to be capable of fulfilling men's desires, and it was also stated as an inference from this, that the growth of human needs is the cause of religious change and progress. If this is true, then the key to the progress of religion is to be found in the successive emergence in human experience of higher and still higher needs. If we can discover the order in which higher aspirations successively emerge in the growth of humanity, then we shall possess the chief clue to the course of religious advance. Now while there is infinite variety in the needs and desires of men, every land and each nation having ideals all its own, we can yet discern, on a broad view of human progress, an advance from lower to higher needs which is common to the human race, and manifests itself in the history of each nation. Three successive conditions of human life stand out before us as markedly distinct, and as occurring wherever civilisation continues to advance. The first is that in which material needs are all-absorbing; the second that in which freedom from material needs has been to some extent attained, and the highest aspirations are directed to the safety and advancement of the nation in which men find themselves united and secure; and the third is that in which the individual realises his own value apart from the state, and develops a personal ideal which is thenceforward his chief end. To these three stages of human existence three types of religion correspond, and the growth of religion consists in the main in its passage from the lower to the higher of these stages.
The religion of the tribe belongs to that stage of man's existence in which his energies are entirely occupied in the struggle against nature and against other tribes. The conditions of his life do not allow his higher faculties to grow, and while he is not without many glimpses and anticipations of higher things, his religion, as a whole, is a mass of childish fancies, and of fixed traditions which he cannot explain, but does not venture to criticise or change. His gods are petty and capricious beings, and his modes of influencing them, though used with zeal and fervour, have little to do with reason or with taste or with morality. It is in this kind of religion that magic of all sorts is at home.
The advance from the religion of the tribe to that of the nation was briefly described above (chapter vi.). The leading classes of the state at least having gained some measure of security and leisure, ideas of a nobler order spring up in their minds. The service of the great gods of the state is organised with befitting dignity and splendour; the best minds contribute to it all they can in the way of art, of poetry, of purified legend, of stately ceremonial. Patriotism and religion are one, the offices of worship are upheld by the whole power of the state, and the gods speak with new authority to the spirit of the worshipper. Now it is that great religious systems arise, so powerful, so highly organised, so splendidly adorned, and surrounded with such venerable traditions, that they seem to be destined for eternity. The priesthood becomes a very powerful class, and acquires a personal holiness which marks out its members as different from other men; the sacrifices acquire the character of divine mysteries, every detail of which, even the most trivial, has a sacred meaning; religious books are compiled or written, which by and by are regarded as inspired, and as possessing absolute authority. It is to be observed that the older style of religion is not at once driven out by the growth of the new, but continues to flourish beside it and under its shadow. The tribes of whom the nation is composed still cherish and adore their own special deities. That older worship is often thought to bring blessings which the new worship of the state does not command, and many a piece of ancient magic, many a practice which has no connection with the state religion, still goes on, especially among those who are not cultivated enough to appreciate the nobler faith which has arisen.
This, however, does not keep the national faith from growing in riches and consistency; and religion appears, as this growth proceeds, to have attained the highest degree of power and authority at which it can possibly arrive. Commanding as it does all the resources of the nation, enriched by all that can be brought to it of material or intellectual riches, placed in a position of absolute exaltation and inviolableness, to what further conquests can it still look forward? Yet when a national religion appears to be most firmly established, the forces are most certainly at work which must ere long lead to a far-reaching change. While the national worship has been growing up to its highest splendours, the lives of the citizens have also been growing richer and deeper, and the individual soul has become aware of wants and longings which cannot be satisfied in the national temple. The further progress of religion is apt to appear as a revolt against the system which has grown so strong. The individual sets out to seek a consistent intellectual view, and so figures as a sceptic. He aims at a higher moral law than that of the priestly system, and is accused of undermining public morality. He feels a new call to personal goodness, a new need for personal atonement with the ideal holiness which he has learned to apprehend; and as the public ritual does not meet these needs, he seeks for new religious associations and perhaps appears to preach a doctrine contrary to patriotism, as it is subversive of the established religion of his country, and to be wilfully destroying what his countrymen revere, and wilfully breaking through old ties and obligations. Thus the individualist stage of religion succeeds the national. But the individualist stage is also, in part at least, the universal stage. What the thinking mind and the pious heart seeks and cannot find in the national worship, is a religion free as the seeker himself has become free, from all that is unreasonable and artificial, a religion therefore in which every thinking mind and every pious heart can have a share. What is gained by individuals in this direction is capable, therefore, if circumstances favour, of proving an acquisition not only for the individual reformer or his nation, but for all men. But as the rise of national religion does not bring to an end the ruder worships of the tribes, which still go on beside it, so neither does the rise of individualism, even in its purest form, bring to an end the national worship. In the long run this may follow, but it does not take place at once. All three forms of religion go on together; the religion of magic, that of stately public sacrifices and ceremonials, and that of intellectual effort and pious meditation and prayer. Each no doubt influences to some extent the others, and is influenced by them in turn.
The movement thus indicated from tribal to national, and from national to individual and to universal religion, is the central development of religion, and all the minor developments which might be traced, as that of sacrifice from rude to spiritual forms, of the functions of the sacred class, of the morality dictated by religion at its various stages, or of the literature connected with piety, may be explained by reference to this one. This movement has taken place in every nation; we have seen something of it in each of our chapters. In some nations it has been early arrested, so that no important contribution has there been brought to the general religion of mankind, in others it has run its full course, and like a great river has arrived at the ocean at last, to mingle its waters with those of other mighty streams.
The story of the growth of the world's religion has therefore to be told in a number of parallel narratives, each dealing with the experience of a separate nation. There can scarcely be any general history of the religion of the world, in addition to those special histories. Some epochs, it is true, stand out as having witnessed simultaneous religious movements in many lands, as if the mind of the whole human race had then been passing through the same crisis of thought. The sixth century B.C. is the age of Confucius and of Laotsze in China, of Gautama in India, of Jeremiah, Ezekiel and the Unknown Prophet of the Exile, of Pythagoras, Heraclitus, and Xenophanes, and also of the rise into prominence of the Greek mysteries. Widely different as the movements are which thus took place contemporaneously in these lands, we may discern in all of them alike the tendency to plant religion in the mind and heart, and to create a deeper union than the old external one, a union based on common intellectual effort and spiritual sympathy. The period immediately before and after the Christian era might also appear to be one in which the mind of the world as a whole made a great step forward. The union of many nations under the sway of Rome, and the universal diffusion of the Greek language as a means of general communication, made men conscious at this time as they had never been before, of the unity of mankind in spite of all differences of race and speech. A philosophy also was popular at this time which was cosmopolitan in its character, and occupied itself with the great problems, which are the same for all, of man's relation to the gods and of his moral duty. If we add to this the combination which took place at Rome and wherever different races met, of various rites and creeds, we see that the age was one singularly disposed to the breaking down of artificial barriers between men, and singularly fitted to promote the growth of a belief in which men of all nations might unite and feel themselves to be brethren.
In these two periods we may recognise important steps in that great Education of the Human Race which the Apostle Paul refers to in a bold philosophy of history (Galat. iv.), and which later thinkers have striven to set forth in detail. After the long servitude of mankind to irrational practices and to gods who were no gods, there comes first the period when men recognise that the true God is to be found not merely outside them but within their hearts and minds, and then the period when they find that the true God is the same to all men, that they are all children of the same Father. But while these general movements of the human mind may be acknowledged, the education of the human race proceeds for the most part in nations. As each nation has to elaborate its own art, its own literature, its own system of law, so each nation has to perfect its own religion. Even after a universal faith has appeared, religion does not cease to be a national thing. Each people moulds the universal religion which it has adopted into a special form, continues by means of it the rites and traditions of the past, and expresses through it its own national character and aspirations. Each nation as well as each individual must necessarily have a faith specially its own, arising out of its own character and experience and in great part incommunicable to others. No two nations could possibly exchange religions.
But on the other hand every nation contains within itself forms of religion which differ from each other as widely as those of two separate nations. It has been said that no religious belief or usage which has once lived can ever be destroyed; and the proof of this may be witnessed in every nation. Even after that religion has come which has its main seat in the heart and soul, the ruder forms of piety live on, and even at times aggressively assert themselves. If there are classes for whom the struggle against material hardships still continues, no lofty religion can be attained by them any more than by savage tribes. As the conditions of their life forbid the growth of their higher faculties, their religion cannot be one of thought or of refinement, but must be one which promises palpable benefits or an escape from immediate dangers. At a somewhat higher stage is the class of those who, while partly escaped from the struggle against want, have not yet fully realised themselves as thinking and spiritual beings, and to whom the benefits of religion still lie outside, rather than in the inner life. When the benefits of religion are thus conceived, its processes must be of a mechanical nature. Hence the various systems of apparatus for connecting the worshipper with a source of good distant from him in time or space, and for fetching as it were from another region, with certainty and accuracy, needed supplies of grace.
The further development of religion in a community so mixed must depend on the progressive education and elevation of the people. As more and more of them are freed first from distracting wants and cares, and then from sordid and materialistic views, their spiritual nature will expand. The need for God himself rather than for his gifts, will arise and increase in their hearts, and they will grow capable of that highest religion which is the life of the soul with God; they will feel its beauty and will drink of the deep springs which it contains, of strength and peace.
To attain this true religion the human race has had to travel far and to make many experiments. Many temples were built and fell to ruin before the true temple of the soul was reached in which, as each finds what he as an individual requires, there is also room for all mankind. Even after this highest religion has been made known to men, it has often been obscured and lost, and many a struggle has been needed to vindicate its claims and help it to retain its rightful place. But with growing experience the world becomes more assured that the simplest and broadest religion ever preached upon this earth is also the best and the truest, and that in maintaining Christianity as at first preached, and applying it in every needed direction, lies the hope of the future of mankind. To those who agree in this conclusion the history of the religion of the world, full of errors and of grievous failures as it has been seen to be, cannot appear to have been a vain and purposeless excursion in a land of shadows. Not without a divine call, and not without divine guidance did man set out so early, and persevere so constantly in spite of all his disappointments, in the search for God.
INDEX
Aesir, 267
Ahura Mazda, 387, 391, 397, 398, 405
Allah, 222
Allat, "The Lady," 165, 173, 219
Amartas, 44
Anaitis, 407
Ancestor-worship, primitive, 33, 40 China, 115 Aryan, 250 India, 338
Angels and demons, Persia, 400, 407
Animals, worship of, 29, 57 in Peru, 86 in Babylonia, 96 in Egypt, 130 how accounted for, 133 in Arabia, 219 in Greece, 277
Animation of Nature in savage thought, 24
Animism, meaning of, 40, 96, 308 in Roman religion, 308
Anthropomorphism, 53 Babylonia, 96 Egypt, 132 Greece, 281
Apocalypse, 213
Arabia, before Mahomet, 218 gods of, 219 Judaism and Christianity in, 223
Art, Phenician, 174 Egyptian, 132 Greece, 280, 292
Aryans, the, 245 description of, 248 in Europe, 256 religion, 250 etymology of names of gods, 250
Ascetics, Brahmanic, 350
Ashera, Canaanite goddess, 172
Ashtoreth, 176
Association, forms of religious, Totem-Clan, 70 nation, 84 Greek mysteries, 298 Greek schools, 303 new form in Israel, 212 new form in Islam, 233
Asuras, 44
Baal, Canaanite god, 171, 189
Babylon and Assyria, religion of, 93 connection with Egypt, 94, 96, 97 connection with China, 93, 98 mythology of, 100
Belief, an essential part of religion, 9, 13 less important than rite in primitive religion, 66
Brahman, etymology of, 339
Brahmanism, 338
Buddhism, 353, sqq. in China, 123
Burnt Njal, 264
Burton, Captain, Pilgrimage to El-Medinah and Mecca, 236
Caaba, 220, 236
Cabiri, 177
Canaanites, 170 religion of, 171, 191
Caste, 338
Celts, 257
China, 106 connection with Babylonia, 107 state religion of, 111
Christianity, 411, sqq.
Civilisation and religion advance together, 15 origin of, 19
Classification of religions, 80
Confucius, 107, 117, sqq.
Continuity of growth in religion, 6
Curiosity, an element of religion, 12
Daniel, 213
Decalogues, 202
Definition of religion, preliminary, 8 fuller, 13
Degeneration in civilisation, 19 in religion, 38
Deuteronomy, 201
Devas, 44, 396
Development of religion, 8, 51, sqq., 430, sqq.
Domestic worship, origin of, 33 China, 115 Aryans, 251 Iceland, 264 Greece, 275 Rome, 311 Brahmanic, 342
Dualism, 56
Eddas, 266
Egypt, religion of, 126, sqq.
Elijah and Elisha, 190
Elves, 265
Ephod, 188
Etruria, religion of, 318
Exile of Israel, 202
Ezra, 204
Fairy Tales (German), 262
Fate, 289
Festivals, Greek, 294
Fetish-worship, 35
Fetishism, 38
Fire, 31
Frazer, Mr., 58, 59; Golden Bough, 28, 279
Frisia, religion in, 263
Functional deities, Greece, 275 Rome, 308
Funeral practices, 62 Egypt, 149 Icelandic, 264 Greece, 282, 290 India, 332 Persian, 405
Games, Greek, 294
Gautama Buddha, 356 his death, 361
Germans, the ancient, 258 their gods, 259 their gods identified with Roman, 260 working religion of, 260 later religion, 263
Ghosts, 34
Gods, the great, in Babylonia, 98 in Egypt, 137 of the Aryans, 252 German, 259 Icelandic, 266 of Homer, 285 Roman, 311 Indian, 326
Gomme, Ethnology in Folklore, 60, 249, 254
Greece, 274
Grimm, German Mythology, 260
Hades, 291
Hammurabi, 93, 95, 202
Hanyfs, 224
Hartmann, Edward von, 46
Heaven, 52 an object of primitive worship, 31, 53 Babylonia, 93 China, 112 Arabia, 219 India, 318, 326, 333
Hegira, 231
Hell, 229, 265, 392
Henotheism, 56
Heroic legends, Babylonian, 100 German, 262
Hesiod, 291
Homer, 283 worship in, 287
Homeric gods, 285
Hymns, Babylonian, 101 Egyptian, 144 Vedic, 328 Persian, 383. See Psalms
Iceland, 264 decay of old religion of, 272
Idols, none in primitive religion, 73 Arabia, 219, 220 German? 264
Immortality, China, 115 Egypt, 152
Incas, the religion of, 85-88
India, 324
Individual, the, not considered in primitive religion, 76
Individual religion, Babylonia, 104 Israel, 205 Greece, 300 India, 346 a high stage of religion, 429 the porch to universalism, 430 See Buddhism
Indo-Europeans. See Aryans
Isaiah xli.-lxvi., 203
Islam, 217. See Mahomet meaning of, 226 spread of, 237 a universal religion, 240 weakness of, 241
Israel, 179
Israel and Canaanites, 184 Prophets, 189 reforms of religion, 200 exile, 202 the return, 204
Istar, 101
Jainism, 362
Japan, 115
Jehovah, 182
Jesus Christ, 413, sqq.
Jewish religion, 205 spiritual elements of, 209 heathenish elements of, 210 Persian influence on? 215
Jinns, 220
Job, 215
Judaism, 205 sqq. Hellenistic period of, 412 at time of Christ, 413
Kathenotheism, 55, 336
Koran, 225, 227, 239
Lang, Andrew, 25, 59; Myth, Ritual, and Religion, 22
Legge, Dr., 110, 113
Literatures, sacred, 179 Babylonia, 93, 100 Buddhist, 353 China, 108 Eddas, 266 Egypt, 127, 154 Koran, 225, 227, 239 Israel, 179, 207 Sibylline books, 319 Vendidad, 406 Zend-Avesta, 382
Local nature of early religion, 60
Local observances, Aryan, 253 old German, 262 Icelandic, 264
Lockyer, Dawn of Astronomy, 94
Magi, 405
Magic, 74 Babylonia, 95 Egypt, 155
Mahomet, 225, sqq. preaching, 228 leaves Mecca, 231 at Medina, 232 breach with Judaism and Christianity, 234 domestic, 235
Manicheism, 408
Mannhardt, Feld- und Waldkulte, 59, 262
Manu, law of, 344
Massebah, 172
Maya, 349
McLennan, 59
Mecca, 220 becomes capital of Islam, 235
Meyer, E., 247
Mithra, 407
Moloch, 174
Monarchical Pantheon of the Aryans, 253
Monotheism, not primitive, 37, 56 in Egypt? 144 emergence of, in Israel, 196 in India, 348
Morality, in primitive religion, 77 Egyptian religion, 155 Greece, 279 Vedic religion, 335 Brahmanism, 345 of Buddhism, 372
Moslem, meaning of, 226 duties of the, 238
Mueller, Mr. Max, 10, 42, 246, 250, 332 his theory of the origin of religion, 43
Mycenae, 282
Mysteries, the Greek, 298
Mythology, origin of, 51 Babylonia, 100 Egypt, 138 Greece, 280 Icelandic, 267 Indian, 333
National religion, how different from earlier form, 81, 428 Israel, 191
Natural religion, 80
Nature gods, growth of, 51
Nature-worship, the greater, 30, 43 the minor, 32, 42, 57
Nirvana, 361, 373
Omens, 290 Roman, 312
Orientation, of temples, 100
Origin of religion, (1) Primitive revelation, 26 (2) Innate idea, 26 (3) Psychological necessity, 27
Orphism, 302
Other World, the in Egypt, 151 with the Semites, 167 Jewish beliefs about, 214 Arabia, 220 Iceland, 265, 266 Homer, 283
Pantheism, in Egypt, 148 India, 336, 348
Patriarchal society and religion of Aryans, 248
Perkunas, 36
Persia, 381 primitive religion, 385 contact of Jews with, 401, 406
Pfleiderer, Otto, 47
Phenicians, 170 religion of, 176 influence on Greece, 282
Philistines, 170
Philosophy, Greek, 301 Indian, 347
Polytheism, origin of, 53 Indian, 335
Prayer, primitive, 71 Israel, 198, 212 Indian, 339 Persian, 382, 394
Priestly code, 202, 403
Priests, none in the earliest religion, 72 not necessary in early Israel, 187 Roman, 313 Brahmans, 338
Primitive religion, the, 21 difference between it and later forms, 79
Prophets, in Israel, 189 their criticism of the old religion of Israel, 192
Psalms, 210. See Hymns
Purity, laws of, Israel, 209 Persia, 404
Rationalism, Greece, 297 India, 350
Reforms, of Israelite religion, 200 of Augustus, 322
Renouf, Le Page, 145
Revealed religion, 80
Reville, M., 25, 31, 42
Resurrection, 214
Retribution, after death, in Egypt, 155 Mahomet, 229 Israel, 214
Rig-veda, the, 325
Ritualism, Brahmanic, 343 Roman, 314 Persian, 403 Jewish, 204, 208
Rome, 305, sqq.
Rouge, M. de la, 145
Sacred places, 59 Semitic, 165 Canaanite, 184, 200 Arabia, 219 Germany, 261
Sacred seasons, 75
Sacrifice, primitive, generally a meal, 67 in China, 114 Semitic, 164 human (Phenician), 175 human (Israel), 187 human (Icelandic), 265 early Israelite, 183 denounced by O. T. prophets, 193 Jewish, 207 Icelandic, 264 Homeric, 287 Persia, 394
Saussaye, P. D. Chantepie de la, 17
Savage elements in all the great religions, 21
Savages, their religion falls short of the definition, 8 represent the original state of mankind, 19 mental habits of, 23 all have religion, 25 the religion of, described, 29, sqq. their beliefs furnish the elements of the great religions, 63
Schrader (Aryans), 247, 252
Semites, 161 religion of, 162 gods of, 164, 173 goddess of, 99, 165, 219
Seraph, 220
Shin-to, 115
Sin, Babylon, 103 Israel, 205
Slavs, 256
Smith, Robertson, 61; Religion of the Semites, 58, 70, 162
Spencer, Mr. H., 11, 39
Spirit, the great, 36
Spirits, of dead persons, 33 worship of, the origin of all religion? 38 in Babylonia, 95 in China, 114 in Arabia, 220 in Greece, 275 in Persia, 398
Standing stones, 60
Sun, 30
Sun-gods, Babylonia, 99 Egypt, 140, 148 Phenician, 176 Arabian, 219
Supreme Being, an object of primitive worship? 36
Survival of savage state in the great religions, 21
Synagogue, 212
Syncretism, of gods in Egypt, 148
Taboo, 72
Taoism, 121
Taylor, Dr. I., 247, 248
Temples, not primitive, 72 Babylonia, 99 Egyptian, 128, 130, 136 Phenician and Jewish, 178 Greek, 292 Roman, 318, 323
Teraphim, 188
Teutons, 256. See Germans
Thunder, 30, 265, 270
Tiele, Dr. C. P., 15
Totemism, 58, 135, 277
Transmigration, 302, 351, 368
Tree-worship, primitive, 32, 59, 278 Babylonia, 101 Canaanites, 172 Arabia, 219 Greece, 278
Tribal religion, 57, 77, 427
Tylor, Mr., Primitive Culture, 10, 20, 25, 29, 39, 62, 63, 68
Under-world, the, Babylonia, 100, 102 Egypt, 140, 142, 152
Unity of all religion, 4
Universal deities of the Aryans, 252
Universalism, in O. T. prophets, 195 in Islam, 240 in Christianity, 419
Urim and Thummim, 188
Vedic hymns, 328
Vedic religion, 324, sqq. its gods, 326 is it early or late? 331
Vow, original meaning of, 75
Waitz and Gerland's Anthropologie der Naturvoelker, 29
Wellhausen, J., 163, 218
Wells, sacred, 32, 57, 59
Worship, an essential element of religion, 9 primitive, 66 Chinese, 112 Egyptian, 147 Canaanite, 173 Israelite, 187 Jewish, 207 Roman, 309 See Sacrifice
Zeus, etymology of, 250, 286, 296
Zoomorphism, 53
Zoroaster, 384 his call, 388 his doctrine, 391
PRINTED AT THE EDINBURGH PRESS, 9 AND 11 YOUNG STREET.
THE END |
|